Tring, Tring
Alexander Graham
Bell. All I knew of him was that he was the guy who invented the telephone.
Which is why pretty much everything I read about him in Edwin S. Grosvenor’s book
was new to me. And fascinating.
As a boy, Bell’s
father introduced him to Sir Charles Wheatstone who had built a machine that
could pronounce human words. It “made a great impression upon my mind”, wrote
Bell later, “although the articulation was disappointingly crude”. Bell and his
brother tried to make a similar machine themselves. It was a good learning
experience to “learn how the sounds of a voice are reproduced”. They also
learned persistence. These were Bell’s first steps to the telephone…
His father
meanwhile catalogued every sound the mouth could make and invented a system of
symbols that indicated the “position and action of the tongue and lips as they
made sounds”. He called it Visible Sound. This system was deemed useful to
teach the deaf. When Bell went to teach at the Clark School for the Deaf, he
used the system. Next, he devised instruments with stretched membranes to
“measure the vibrations created by human speech”. All of this would help him
later in life to build the first membrane telephone, the “ancestor of all the
telephones of today”, recalled Bell.
Bell played around
with ways to send sounds via telegraph. But he wanted more: to not just send a
few sounds, but entire human voices. By 1873, Bell was beginning to feel that a
“marriage of acoustic theory and electricity” would make a telephone possible.
When he finally got the patents for the telephone in 1876, he had control over
a world changing invention. But operationalizing the idea was a different
problem altogether.
Recognizing all
this, Western Union, the monopolistic telegraph operator in the US, offered to
operationalize the telephone. But the terms they offered left Bell with little.
They could afford to be that way because:
-
Western
Union had the telegraph cables already laid out;
-
Investment
in (new telephone) cables would take a lot of money;
-
Who
could Bell turn to anyway for alternatives anyway?
So Bell refused
their terms and founded a new company. It would prove to be a very hard, long
drawn battle involving multiple patent fights, money problems, very limited
coverage initially and technical challenges (distance a signal could be
carried, cross-talk, distortion, theft of copper wires etc). When electricity
lines were laid later, they would cause interference with the telephone lines.
But Bell would win
the war to commercialize the phone, eventually becoming so big that his company
would be accused of monopolistic behavior itself! His company had evolved over
the years to become a goliath known as… AT&T.
Oh, I didn't know Alexander Graham Bell founded AT&T. It has become so big today.
ReplyDeleteAnd, telephony combined with digital advancements have given us a handheld device, handheld demon is my preferred word! It connects to all else but disconnects oneself. :-(
Mobile addiction led to a protest march by children in Germany - they expressed that between the mobile and the child, the mobile takes so much priority that children feel neglected by the parents. I can relate to it; I too get ignored sometimes.
Fortunately, despite many who do not give thought to people noticing, "for this person only mobile matters, not the person with whom face to face conversation was going on, which was abruptly/rudely cut", there are some people who make it a point to let the person in front know they care. They are in charge, the mobile has not taken over them. :-) I respect them a lot.