Contested Indian History #3: Independence
Once India became independent, there was a desire to document the freedom struggle. To that end, the records of the Indian Historical Records Commission (IHRC) had to be made accessible. But the content was too much – no one historian could go through it all. It had to be a collective activity, and it felt necessary to involve the Indian government, writes Shaan Kashyap in Who Owns History? President Rajendra Prasad too felt that the “role of history” in nation building was critical, so he full heartedly supported the initiative. Not just the independence struggle but also its “distant and glorious past”. Prasad may have been sincere, but it would set the precedent of what would follow: “The mandate to the professional historians was provided by the speeches of the politicians.” The seeds had been sown – History was not just reporting events; it was meant to serve the present. Back then, that purpose was “nationalizing the past”. The intelligentsia agreed that Nehruvian I...