Mixing Them Up at School
In India, people will send their kids to schools at the other
end of town if that’s where the good schools are. And costs in good schools are
high too. In the West, on the other hand, schooling is free provided you
send your kids to the neighborhood school. That provision has led parents
in the West to want to live in areas with good schools, which in turn drives up
real estate prices in those areas.
But I am guessing you knew all that already.
That leads me to what Carl Chancellor and Richard D.
Kahlenberg ask:
“Which sorts of investments in education give the
greatest bang for the buck?”
In the West, due to the neighborhood school model I described
above, the choices were:
a) Increase
spending in schools; or
b) Increase
economic integration in schools.
Option (a) is self-explanatory, so I’ll skip that. Option (b)
requires making cheap housing available even in the more affluent/middle class
areas. If you did that, (more of) the poorer kids would end up going to middle
class schools.
So which option would produce better results? Montgomery
County in the US tried option (b); and it has produced “far greater academic
gains for poor children”. Why? Chancellor and Kahlenberg cite the following
reasons:
a) Peers: Having
classmates who do their homework and generally value education has a positive
influence on the poorer kids.
b) Parents: Middle-class
parents are more involved and come to PTA meetings. They are also the “squeaky
wheel”, demanding the best for their kids from schools.
c)
Teachers: The best
teachers don’t exactly seek out poorer schools. They tend to teach at the
better/middle class schools.
So maybe the much reviled Kapil Sibal was right after all in
trying option (b) back home. Having the poorer kids go to middle class schools
does increase the odds for those kids. Of course, it is still essential that
the middle class kids far outnumber the poorer ones; otherwise, the school
flips and becomes a government school. And Sibal’s ratio does ensure that the
flip doesn’t happen.
I never thought I would ever write a blog supporting anything
Sibal ever did!
I am not sure which Sibal scheme is referred in this blog. I am not very knowledgeable on this subject, I admit.
ReplyDeleteThere was one scheme in which Sibal directed schools to make students do many, many tests and keep the record of all performances, to the effect exam marks are no longer the criteria. Virtually a kind of "every week (or at best every fortnight) is one semester"!
Who will do all the clerical drudgery involved became a big question. Government will only say, "Do it, will you". Helpless school managements will ditto these words to the teachers, for they are not allowed a 'say' on education. Anyway, what happened was teachers more or less became clerks. They were rendered dispirited with the profession, which by itself has the potential to offer job satisfaction and joy of teaching. At any rate, all the teachers we knew hated not only the scheme but also its perpetrator! All of them, I am inclined to believe, must have voted for BJP for just this reason alone! :-)
If some other marvelous scheme of Sibal is being addressed here in this blog, maybe another blog can highlight its details and merits. I do not recall any, but do accept many good schemes are surely possible at policy making level and might have been promoted too.