Misquoted

There are so many quotations out there that are, ironically, mis-quotes! The most famous one is “Ignorance is bliss”. What Thomas Gray really said was:
“Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise.”
Totally different statements, aren’t they?

Another such instance is what almost all companies believe in:
“What can’t be measured can’t be managed.”
What Paul Drucker actually said was:
“What gets measured gets managed — even when it’s pointless to measure and manage it, and even if it harms the purpose of the organization to do so.”
The first part got faithfully (albeit in a twisted, double negative kind of way) rephrased, but dropping the rest of what Drucker said distorts his message altogether.

During their fight with Hachette, Amazon willfully quoted George Orwell (but only partially) to distort what he said entirely. Amazon wrote:
“The famous author George Orwell came out publicly and said about the new paperback format, if "publishers had any sense, they would combine against them and suppress them." Yes, George Orwell was suggesting collusion.”
So what did Orwell really say?
“The Penguin Books are splendid value for sixpence, so splendid that if the other publishers had any sense they would combine against them and suppress them.”
Amazon, Amazon. Did you really think you wouldn’t get caught in an age when everything is just a Google search away? Really?

But, of course, there are folks whose alarm bells don’t ring no matter what they read on the Net. So it’s Facebook to the rescue! Here’s how:
“The big-brains behind Facebook are testing out new [Satire] tags, so that unsuspecting ideologues the world over will stop sharing fake news articles as the real thing. Because we’re all too stupid to know the difference and because we obviously care less that Facebook is sucking out our brains.”
To those who say that Google’s making us stoopid and Facebook is sucking out our brains, I ask: Why not just stop using them? But of course, nobody can do that, can they?

Then again, didn’t Mark Twain not urge us to take misquoting to the next level when he said:
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.”
Twain did say that; that’s not a misquote!

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarJuly 14, 2017 at 4:09 PM

    The end part with “Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” Twain did say that; that’s not a misquote!" is good to have. It has the Mark Twain mark of humor and helps concluding with a smile. :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn
Read more

Handling of the Satyam Scam

The Satyam scam. How does that fit into Montek Singh Ahluwalia’s book on reforms in India, Backstage ? The reason is that, as both NASSCOM and the government of India felt: “(Satyam’s) collapse would create a great deal of disruption for clients worldwide and seriously damage India’s reputation as a reliable source of software services.”   Therefore, the government decided to work with the private sector to “organize a quick takeover by a reputable new buyer, who would quickly restart the company”. But that could not be done overnight. In the meantime, the new board would have to reach out to Satyam’s clients and “reassure them that the company would survive”.   For the new board to have credibility when it made that statement, it had to be staffed with people who understood the private sector, the IT sector in particular, and commanded respect and trust. Deepak Parikh from HDFC was made chairman, and other members of the board included a former NASSCOM chairman, CII member,
Read more