Ottoman Tidbits
I read this Hourly History book on the Ottoman empire.
The book felt like reading through Mughal history in India, constrained to an
hour of reading (such a book would probably have been limited to Babur, Akbar,
Aurungzeb, and fading away with Bahadur Shah Zafar with the rise of the
British; with some tidbits like the Taj Mahal thrown in). Except that, unlike
the Mughal era, a lot of the Sultans were short-lived, and so there was a lot
of churn in policies and governance mechanisms. While not a very informative
book (it has too much to cover), it’s enough to get the broad brushstrokes.
~~
One amusing tidbit
went like this. When the empire was still small and growing, the Sultan Murad
II felt he had secured the place with expansion and treaties. So he abdicated
the throne in favour of his son, Mehmed II. Except the son was just 12 years old!
The Sultan retired to “enjoy a lifestyle worthy of an ex-Sultan”. But, as would
happen repeatedly, the areas to the west, being Christian, always feared the
rise of a Muslim power so close to them. This time, they assembled a crusader
army petitioned for by Venice and Hungary. Mehmed II got his own army ready to
face the threat, but he wasn’t naïve.
“He
recognized the importance of the coming battle, and asked his father, Murad II,
to return to the throne and lead the army.”
Murad, however,
was enjoying the good life too much – he refused to return! Mehmed then sent
him a letter:
“If
you are the Sultan, come and lead your armies. If I am the Sultan, I hereby
order you to come and lead my armies.”
Murad II was boxed
in – he agreed to become the Sultan again and led the armies to victory. He
would rule until his death, upon which his now 19 yo old would take the throne
again.
~~
I had read that
one of the reasons Japan fell to the West before the World Wars was that
there were too many vested interests within Japan whose hold on power and
influence would fade if the state modernized. The Samurai, for example, opposed
the entry of firearms because it would erode their aura and power.
The Ottomans had a
similar problem with their Janissaries, a “feared and
effective fighting force” formed in the 1300’s. Then it became a parallel
power-center, whose skills progressively were as much in politics as is in
being a fighting machinery. When thwarted, they could (and did) depose the
Sultan. Repeatedly.
“This
led to the imposition of sultans who were good for the Janissary Corps, but not
for the empire as a whole.”
Worse, as the
importance and impact of artillery began to grow in Europe, the Janissaries opposed its introduction within the Ottoman
Empire. For the same reason as the Samurai – artillery eroded their power within
the empire.
~~
As the empire
became powerful, guilds and groups within the empire became richer and
influential. Sure, they brought in a lot of progress in technology. But when
they felt threatened by a tech or idea from outside (i.e., Europe), they would
oppose it. Like the calligraphers guild who opposed the entry of the printing
press. Guilds who had become specialists in other tech would oppose the entry
of any new tech from Europe.
As the Ottoman
Empire began to turn its back on progress and new tech, it eventually led to
the coinage of the term “Sick Man of Europe”.
~~
Ultimately then, the empire disintegrated and fell apart as much due to external threats (Europe on its West, Russia on its East), choosing the losing aside during the World War, as much due to its self-inflicted wounds from within (the Janissaries and the guilds).
Comments
Post a Comment