Bill Watterson #1: Merchandising Push
I found Matthew
Morgan’s long post on Bill Watterson, the creator of Calvin and Hobbes,
refreshing – it provided a new perspective.
~~
The post starts
with Watterson in his college dorm (hostel) “thinking that his dorm room needs
an amateur rendition of Michelangelo’s “Creation of Adam”!
“What
the work will lack in “colour sense and technical flourish” it’ll make up for
with comedy — specifically “the incongruity of having a High Renaissance
masterpiece in a college dorm that had the unmistakeable odour of old beer cans
and older laundry”.”
Like all college
kids, it’s only when he’s half done that he remembered he should have asked for
permission! He goes to ask the housing director. Who immediately guesses the
kid’s probably already done it. So the director agrees, on the condition the
ceiling be restored to its original condition before the term ends. Watterson
agrees, completes his “work”, and then wipes it clean.
~~
Calvin and
Hobbes was always a
one-man operation:
“I
write every word, draw every line, color every Sunday strip, and paint every
book illustration myself.”
For Watterson,
every detail in every panel of every comic strip matters. The smallest details
matter, they are what make a strip truly great. Conversely:
“If
all the cartoonist does is “illustrate a joke”, the cartoonist “is going to
lose”.”
~~
Creativity v/s
commerce, the long-running feud Watterson engaged in:
“Here,
commerce is represented by Universal Press Syndicate, which Watterson refers to
as “the syndicate”, like an organisation of villains in a comic book. (Once, he
even publicly called them “a bloodsucking corporate parasite”.)”
To be fair, the
syndicate was the middleman between the comic artists and the publishing
outlets. Without them, few cartoonists stood a realistic chance of getting
published or making a liveable income.
“Except
that Watterson sees them as taking a side — the side of the newspapers.”
What would be
artistic considerations for most, Watterson considered almost a spiritual
aspect! He looked at them as “questions of ethics, which explains his refusal
to back down even when giving in was so much easier (not to mention more
profitable).”
~~
Watterson’s
contract with the syndicate was the usual kind:
“The
syndicate retained the right to turn Calvin and Hobbes into toys,
t-shirts, and other ephemera, and it became clear pretty early that they could
all expect stupid amounts of money from merchandising.”
What the syndicate
had in mind included Calvin sweatshirts. Spaceman Spiff bumper stickers. An
animated Calvin and Hobbes Saturday show, maybe a movie. What
made Watterson shudder the most was a Hobbes doll!
One can understand
why the syndicate couldn’t get Watterson on this topic:
“All
that money for doing what he loves? Seemed a no-brainer.”
What was different
(strange?) about Watterson was that he had “an exacting idea of what it was he
loved doing, and it was at odds with toys and tat, indifferent to silos of cash”.
What was Watterson’s problem with merchandising? We’ll see in the next blog.
Comments
Post a Comment