Viruses - Bacteriophages
One of the
chapters in Pranay Lal’s Invisible Empire starts with these lines:
“Say
the word ‘virus’ and the first thought that comes to the mind is of the
diseases they cause.”
But they can also
be the cure for some diseases, he writes.
The Britisher,
Ernest Hankin, was sent to India. His job was to “protect British troops from
infectious diseases”. Like cholera. By 1894, he was curious about the Maagh
Mela in Allahabad, on the banks of the Ganga. Over 3 million devotees arrived
every day during that festival. He inspected the waters during this period:
“There
was very little bacterial contamination of their waters despite the multitudes
of people and their cattle bathing in them, discarding their waste and burning
corpses along their banks.”
By 1895, he had
written a paper that the Ganga was cleaner than most British or European rivers
, “despite the way they were treated”. He wondered why that was the case, how
the Ganga managed to avoid the decay seen in European rivers.
When Mark Twain
visited India, he met Hankin and wrote the following lines:
“It
had long been noted as a strange thing that while Benares is often afflicted
with the cholera, she does not spread it beyond her borders. This could not be
accounted for.”
Twain mentioned
what Hankin had measured and found:
“He
(Hankin) got water at the mouth of the sewers where they empty into the river
at the bathing ghats; a cubic centimeter of it contained millions of cholera
germs; at the end of six hours they were all dead.”
Hankin was very
scientific, wrote Twain:
“He
caught a floating corpse, towed it to the shore, and from beside it he dipped
up water that was swarming with cholera germs; at the end of six hours they
were all dead.”
Next:
“(Hankin)
added swarm after swarm of cholera germs to this water; within the six hours
they always died.”
Being a scientific
man, Hankin didn’t buy into the mythical explanations of the curative powers of
the Ganga. Instead, he wondered if the Ganga possessed some antibacterial
properties? But Hankin didn’t have any answers, or proof, of what might be
killing the bacteria. Until 1912, though many scientists found other scenarios
where “something” so tiny that it could pass through antibacterial filters
seemed to kill bacteria, nobody took the thought process to its logical end.
Then in 1912, Felix d’Herelle postulated that the “something” were viruses, and
labelled them bacteriophages – “eaters of bacteria”.
You must be wondering if bacteriophages are real (they are), then why haven’t they been used as cure/prevention to bacterial diseases? Ah, that’s a story for another blog…
Comments
Post a Comment