Federalism and India #1: Theory and Intent

Federalism. Center-state split of responsibilities and finances. To understand the right split for it, Karthik Muralidharan starts from first principles in Accelerating India’s Development.

 

What are the pros of being a large country? Large countries can have economies of scale – their economic size can be larger, tax from which makes for powerful armies which means they are less threatened by enemies. Large countries can spend more on defense investments, some of which may find civilian applications (think of satellites and the Internet). A large geographic size means a bigger market within one’s borders without the hassle of negotiating inter-country trade agreements. Natural disasters are limited in their scope; and people can move elsewhere. Conversely, the unimpacted parts of the country can supply the money to rebuild the impacted areas.

 

How about the cons of being a large country? Large countries will inevitably host diverse identities, but national policies should be uniform. That can be a source of friction. A second problem is the increasing distance between the citizens and decision makers – physical distance, longer feedback times, and the ever increasing risk of policies working in some areas but not others.

 

Federalism is an attempt to try and have the best of both worlds. The idea is to bring the point of governance closer to the regions – local governments should decide how and what to spend on. Federalism is not a hierarchical power structure; rather, it is a model for the distribution of responsibilities. In India, that distribution of responsibilities is called out in the Union and State lists.

 

That’s the theory, anyway. In practice, some topics cannot be cleanly assigned to one entity only. Take education. Research works better at scale, and falls under the center. The medium of education is a state matter. And lower-level matters, like tracking attendance of teachers are left to local level. Further, disagreements arise on who decides if there is a clash of views – center, state or local? This is a continuously evolving topic and cannot be frozen forever. Plus, of course:

“Tensions can be exacerbated when different parties govern different tiers of government.”

 

A benefit of federalism is the freedom to make policy choices. This allows different units of governance (the drilldown of federalism doesn’t have to stop at state sized units) to try different policies. What works could be copied in others. Conversely, any bad policies would be limited in the areas they affect.

 

That’s the theory, spirit and intent of federalism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Why we Deceive Ourselves

Europe #3 - Innsbruck