Federalism and India #1: Theory and Intent
Federalism.
Center-state split of responsibilities and finances. To understand the right
split for it, Karthik Muralidharan starts from first principles in Accelerating India’s Development.
What are the pros
of being a large country? Large countries can have economies of scale – their
economic size can be larger, tax from which makes for powerful armies which
means they are less threatened by enemies. Large countries can spend more on
defense investments, some of which may find civilian applications (think of
satellites and the Internet). A large geographic size means a bigger market
within one’s borders without the hassle of negotiating inter-country trade
agreements. Natural disasters are limited in their scope; and people can move
elsewhere. Conversely, the unimpacted parts of the country can supply the money
to rebuild the impacted areas.
How about the cons
of being a large country? Large countries will inevitably host diverse
identities, but national policies should be uniform. That can be a source of
friction. A second problem is the increasing distance between the citizens and
decision makers – physical distance, longer feedback times, and the ever
increasing risk of policies working in some areas but not others.
Federalism is an
attempt to try and have the best of both worlds. The idea is to bring the point
of governance closer to the regions – local governments should decide how and
what to spend on. Federalism is not a hierarchical power structure;
rather, it is a model for the distribution of responsibilities. In India, that
distribution of responsibilities is called out in the Union and State lists.
That’s the theory,
anyway. In practice, some topics cannot be cleanly assigned to one entity only.
Take education. Research works better at scale, and falls under the center. The
medium of education is a state matter. And lower-level matters, like tracking
attendance of teachers are left to local level. Further, disagreements arise on
who decides if there is a clash of views – center, state or local? This is a
continuously evolving topic and cannot be frozen forever. Plus, of course:
“Tensions
can be exacerbated when different parties govern different tiers of
government.”
A benefit of
federalism is the freedom to make policy choices. This allows different units
of governance (the drilldown of federalism doesn’t have to stop at state sized
units) to try different policies. What works could be copied in others.
Conversely, any bad policies would be limited in the areas they affect.
That’s the theory, spirit and intent of federalism.
Comments
Post a Comment