Ideologies and Politics

Dan Williams wrote an interesting post on ideologies. The term “ideology”, as we know all too well, refers to “belief systems”. While some like Karl Marx viewed ideologies as “inherently bad”, not everyone agrees. For most people, the term doesn’t necessarily have a bad connotation. It just refers to belief systems.

 

Except, as Williams says, when the term is used in politics. He quotes Christopher Federico and Ariel Malka who say, in politics, ideologies serve a purpose. Huh? Politics, they say, covers a huge and diverse set of matters from economics to trade policy to social matters to immigration to geopolitics to taxation. Voters cannot evaluate any political party issue by issue.

“(Ideology) derives in large part from the inherent complexity of politics… By providing leaders and citizens alike with comprehensive, organised frameworks for making sense of politics, ideologies supply political actors with ready-made judgements about the state of the world and many issues at once while also furnishing an overarching narrative about why various political concerns fit together.”

The left-right split is an extreme form of such, er, simplification:

“One-dimensional politics collapses this complexity. Instead of choosing issue by issue, policy by policy, you decide whether you support “left-wing” or “right-wing” (or centrist, far-left, or far-right) political representatives and parties.”

 

Therefore, says Williams, recognize that:

“Ideologies do not aim exclusively or even primarily at truth. They must provide simple, shared narratives that lend clarity and coherence to a complex political world and set of policy proposals.”

While it simplifies, it also over-simplifies. Which is why, in politics, the term “ideological” has progressively acquired the negative meaning of “some rigid framework of preconceived ideas which distorts… understanding”. By the other side, of course, never one’s own.

 

He then asks us to consider the counter-factual. Imagine a politician or party that is “careful, scientific, and humble (i.e., non-ideological)”. Without “simplifying and unifying narratives”, but with the willingness to admit things are complex or no easy solutions exist or that they might be wrong, how do you think such a party or politician would fare?

 

An informative, though a bit depressive, perspective.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn
Read more

Handling of the Satyam Scam

The Satyam scam. How does that fit into Montek Singh Ahluwalia’s book on reforms in India, Backstage ? The reason is that, as both NASSCOM and the government of India felt: “(Satyam’s) collapse would create a great deal of disruption for clients worldwide and seriously damage India’s reputation as a reliable source of software services.”   Therefore, the government decided to work with the private sector to “organize a quick takeover by a reputable new buyer, who would quickly restart the company”. But that could not be done overnight. In the meantime, the new board would have to reach out to Satyam’s clients and “reassure them that the company would survive”.   For the new board to have credibility when it made that statement, it had to be staffed with people who understood the private sector, the IT sector in particular, and commanded respect and trust. Deepak Parikh from HDFC was made chairman, and other members of the board included a former NASSCOM chairman, CII member,
Read more