"Cheating" in Sports

Games like chess can and have been played online. Not just friends playing with each other, even tournaments have been conducted that way. That creates a problem, writes Joe Posnanski:

“Because computers are so much better than people at chess now, there’s a big, big problem with cheating. People playing online will often use a chess engine to defeat people and build up their ratings.”

This has set off a cat and mouse game:

“Chess.com has instituted ultra-sophisticated methods of tracking down cheaters and then closing their accounts.”

 

Some time back, the rising star, Hans Niemann, defeated world champion Magnus Carlsen. An upset, no doubt. But Niemann didn’t get a single point in the rest of the tournament. So this guy can beat the world champion but not even a scrape a draw in his other matches? Then it happened again… soon after, Niemann beat Carlsen again. Carlsen was convinced Niemann was cheating – he didn’t say it officially – but he tweeted something that indicated it, and withdrew from the tournament.

 

Even though there was no proof Niemann had cheated, the backlash followed – Chess.com deactivated his account, and he was searched extensively during his next match (“more extensively than gangsters search each other in the movies”).

 

Here’s the weird thing though: he’d defeated Carlsen in a face-to-face match, not online. There wasn’t any proof he’d cheated. And yet…

 

Posnanski wonders if this tendency to assume the worst in sports is getting out of control. The sprinter, Devon Allen, was disqualified from the 110 meters hurdles at the World Athletics Championships for a false start. How did they conclude he had jumped the gun?

“World Athletics has determined that it is not possible for someone to push off the block within a tenth of a second of the gun without false starting. They have science that shows it is beyond human capabilities to react that fast.”

Posnanski tears into that:

“That’s nonsense, that’s pseudoscience, there’s no way that they can limit human capabilities like that.”

Wait, it gets even weirder:

“Besides, do you know what Devon Allen’s reaction time was? It was 0.09 seconds. One hundredth of a second too fast, according to World Athletics’ science. They’re THAT sure that .01 seconds — and EXACTLY .01 seconds — is the limit of human possibilities that they will disqualify an athlete who has trained his whole life for this moment because he reacted one thousandth of a second faster than they think possible?”

 

In technology we trust. Far too much, says Posnanski.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more