When the Majority Feels Demonized
Whites won’t be the absolute majority for too long in America. I thought this was the fear that drove so much of the Trump’ish change in their politics. But of course, reality is far more messy than that.
One set of very
vocal Americans began to trumpet the impending change in demographics as a good
thing – as the end of white oppression (in America). Everything white was
demonized. White majority was equated with white supremacy.
Politicians did
what they do in such situations. Starting with Hillary’s 2016 campaign, the
Democratic party decided they should woo the groups who would collectively
become the new majority, i.e., the non-whites. Which meant that more and more
whites saw no option but the Republican party.
As Michael Barone
put it, the way some cheered the impending reduction in the percentage of white
people soon became a “message that sometimes sounds like ‘hurry up and die’”.
Inevitably there was a backlash, writes Andrew Sullivan:
“By
“boomerang,” I mean racializing politics so aggressively that you actually help
create and legitimize a racially white party — because of negative
partisanship.”
Sow the wind, reap
the whirlwind:
“If
you demonize an entire race, you may at some point get the compliment returned.
The more you raise racial consciousness among non-whites, the more you risk the
same among whites.”
Massive illegal
immigration certainly fanned the flames. And on this, both American parties had
something to gain – the Republicans liked the cheap labour, the Democrats liked
the prospect of future voters.
An over-the-top
left liberalism has created the white reaction, feels Sullivan:
“(It
is) liberalism that fuels and empowers, legitimizes and provokes white
nationalism. It sees race first; it sees groups rather than individuals; it
denies the possibility of color-blind citizenship; and it sees white people as
a “problem”.
Sadly, says
Sullivan, the two sides have now created a circle, where each side fuels the
other.
“They
foster ever-increasing levels of racial identity in each other; they demonize
whole populations because of skin color; they both believe liberal democracy is
rigged against them; and the logic of their mutual, absolutist racial politics
is civil conflict, not democratic deliberation… They need each other.”
I can see several parallels in all this to what’s been happening in India, if one replaces “race” with “religion”, and “white” with “Hindu”.
Comments
Post a Comment