Algorithms and Us
“We used to call
this ‘things that are easy for people but hard for computers’, but really, it
was things that are easy for people to do but hard for people to describe
to computers. The breakthrough of machine learning is that it gives us a
way for the computer to work out the description.”
Today’s
social networks are largely automated: algorithms decide what shows up on your
feed, be it on Facebook or YouTube or Google Search. Almost always, no human
has any role in deciding shows up on your feed. And therein lies the paradox:
“Yet they (the
algorithms) are also totally dependent on human behavior, because what they’re
really doing is observing, extracting and inferring things from what hundreds
of millions or billions of people do.”
And
that raises interesting (and uncomfortable) questions:
“What does this
tell us about abuse of the platforms, and how much might machine learning
change all of this?”
Who is
to blame for what we dislike about social media? The people whose usage of it
acts as input to the algorithms? Or the algorithm itself? Or both? And since
the answer is almost certainly “both”, it opens the system to abuse from two
ends:
“There are two
ways to rob a bank - you can bypass the alarm and pick the lock on the safe, or
you can con the manager. These are both ways that your processing systems are
failing, but now one of the processing
systems is us.”
And who
analyzes the algorithm itself?
“Once you start
using the computer to analyse the computer, you risk creating feedback cycles.”
So yes,
algorithms are definitely part of the problem. But we the users are the other
part. And while fixing both parts is necessary, fixing the algorithm needs a
couple of companies to change. But fixing the users? Who’s going to do that?
Comments
Post a Comment