Machiavelli, Part 1: The Gangster's Handbook
Niccolo
Machiavelli. (I’ll call him “M” in the rest of the blogs). A man synonymous
with ruthlessness and power hungriness. Unethical, unscrupulous, cut-throat.
The book behind that reputation, The
Prince, was called “a handbook for gangsters” by Bertrand Russell. At the
peak of the war between Catholics and Protestants, the two sides could agree on
one thing: M was a bad guy. Of course, the Catholics thought M was a heretic,
like the Protestants. While the Protestants thought that M’s advice was exactly
how the Catholics behaved.
The
museum in Florence has statues of Galileo, Leonardo, Michelangelo... and M! To
many (not just in Florence), M was an intellectual hero. He was a great
philosophical and political thinker.
So
which view is right? In the first part of his podcast on the man,
Sebastian Major contends that you can’t decouple M from the environment he
lived in. Ergo, he takes us back to Florence in the 1400’s, one of the great
city-state powers of the age along with Venice, Milan, Naples and the
Papal states. Lesser powers would rear their head now and then, and often be
gobbled by the bigger powers. This was the backdrop to M's life and works. (Remind
you of Game of Thrones?)
Florence
was a Republic. Then, Cosimo of the Medici family used his banking wealth, power
and connections to practically own the Republic. Until France defeated Florence
and forced a humiliating surrender. A seething Florence turned its wrath on the
Medicis and forced them out of the city. It was in this Medici-free city, a
Republic again, that M rose in government in various designations.
Alas!
Another Medici soon rode back to town at the head of an army and took control
of Florence again, and the Republic was overthrown again. M was perceived to be
close to the erstwhile Republic, so he was tried, imprisoned and tortured. But
they couldn’t find any proof that M was part of any anti-Medici group, so they
let him free. He left Florence, a self-imposed exile.
It was
in exile that he wrote The Prince, a
book on how a ruler should rule. M dedicated it to the ruling Medici. Many
believe this was an attempt by M to prove himself a loyal, no nonsense, smart
political operator who could be of use to the Medicis. By this interpretation, The Prince is M’s resumé!
Here
are some of the famous points from the book: Rulers should, from time to time,
lie and deceive. A new prince should make a show of strength. The ends justify
the means. A leader needs to be cruel at times. A prince should surround
himself with “people you can control”. And most famously, it threw up the
eternal question for those in power: is it better to be loved or to be feared?
And
then the podcast switches gears to show how grey matters really are…
To me, this is a very informative blog, though the author has said many of these during conversations. Since I have little tuning to politics, everything evaporated very soon! :-)
ReplyDeleteI liked these points (quoted below) made in the blog:
1) A man synonymous with ruthlessness and power hungriness. Unethical, unscrupulous, cut-throat. The book behind that reputation, The Prince, was called “a handbook for gangsters” by Bertrand Russell.
2) Here are some of the famous points from the book: Rulers should, from time to time, lie and deceive. A new prince should make a show of strength. The ends justify the means. A leader needs to be cruel at times. A prince should surround himself with “people you can control”. And most famously, it threw up the eternal question for those in power: is it better to be loved or to be feared?
Point 2 is indeed the eternal truth of politics. I FULLY ENDORSE IT (in the sense they are statements of eternal, unchanging truth). Fools only insist that politics can be or need to be otherwise! I am indeed a persistent fool in this regard! :-)
Coming to Point 1, unknowingly and unwittingly those who condemned Niccolo Machiavelli used these terms (quoting the blog:) << Unethical, unscrupulous, cut-throat and his book as “a handbook for gangsters” >> Isn't it obvious all these attributes do not describe Machiavelli, but succinctly define the political arena (which M what described)?!
I found this very comforting in the blog: "The museum in Florence has statues of Galileo, Leonardo, Michelangelo... and M!" My happiness: Just because he spoke the bitter truth, he didn't stay condemned or not considered for honor. Very Good. I too agree with, "M was an intellectual hero. He was a great philosophical and political thinker".