Whose Side is the Opposition On?
When the
Opposition asked whether the surgical strikes after Uri had even happened or if
it was just government progoganda, I felt it was very insulting. Not because
governments don’t lie, not because the NDA/BJP is above lieing, but because the
action in question was supposed to have been done by the Army. So was the
Opposition saying that today even the Army is part of politics, that they would
go along with such lies? If so, doesn’t it mean that the Army in India is no
different than the army of dictatorships? And in such a scenario, would the
Army allow any free and fair elections? If all this were true, surely we are
facing a much bigger problem, a behind the scenes Emergency situation. So how
come we don’t see the logical next step then, the Opposition up in arms against
the “second” Emergency, except this time the Army is a part of it?
Not satisfied with
their contradictions, this time after the air strikes in Balakot, the
Opposition continues with its contradictory lies:
1)
Did
the air strikes even happen? Well ok, if they didn’t and this is all just a big
BJP + Army lie, then by definition, Pakistan sent out its air force without
reason or provocation. And yet the Opposition has no problem with an
unprovoked, without reason attack by Pakistan?
2)
Mamata
asked to know the headcount of dead. And how does she propose we get that info,
from the highly trustworthy “victims of terrorism”, the Pakistan power elite?
And this woman is a PM contender? One shudders…
3)
And
then there is Sam Pitroda, Congress’s Indian Overseas Chief, who says all of
Pakistan cannot be blamed for either 26/11 or Pulwama:
“Eight people (26/11 terrorists) come and
do something, you don't jump on entire nation (Pakistan).”
i)
Wow!
The West stopped that differentiation between terrorists and their
hosts/trainers after 9/11. India seemed to have stopped it after 26/11, but not
Pitroda or the Congress apparently.
ii)
And
only 8 people were responsible f0r 26/11? How about those trained them? How
about those who funded and created/allowed the infrastructure to come up? As
long as we have the likes of Pitroda in this country, the likes of Pakistan
will always have someone who laps up their lies. I guess Siddhu isn’t the only
Pakistan lover in the Congress.
4)
From Akhilesh
Yadav’s SP party, RG Yadav accused the government of wanting the Pulwama attack
to happen so they could gain political mileage. Modi’s tweet in response was
spot on:
“Opposition is the natural habitat of
terror apologists and questioners of our armed forces.”
Sure, this is
election season. Sure, politics is ugly. But apparently our Opposition would
rather question the Army than the enemy. Is it because our Army doesn’t have a
religion whereas the enemy does?
Comments
Post a Comment