The Bad Guy on the Internet
Nicholas Carr
(he of the “Is Google making us stupid?”
article fame) just released his new book, The
Big Switch. In his blog, he wrote
an essay adapted from one of the chapters of the book. He starts with what he
seeks to question, the notion that the Internet is the great emancipator:
“The Net is “the world’s largest
ungoverned space,” declare Google’s Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen in their new
book, The New
Digital Age. “Never before in history
have so many people, from so many places, had so much power at their
fingertips.”… Seemingly uncontrolled and uncontrollable, the Web was routinely
portrayed as a new frontier.”
Then Carr gets
down to business, calling the above notion “at best a half-truth and at worst a
delusion”:
“The Internet in particular put enormous
power into the hands of individuals, but they put even greater power into the
hands of companies, governments, and other institutions.”
He may be partly
right about that; but he gets his history all wrong: contrary to what he
claims, neither the (personal) computer nor the Internet were invented as “technologies
of control”. But yes, they have evolved over time to “influence how we
think and what we do, to funnel our attention and actions toward their own ends”:
just think of those Google ads when you search or the Facebook ads on your
page. Though I would still call those nudges, not outright control. You have
the choice to ignore the recommendations and ads, don’t you?
Carr also points
out that all the datafication that’s going on (see my earlier blog on
datafication) which finds patterns that are then used by corporations to
decide their next steps. True, but again, that’s not control. At worst, that’s
just giving the people bread and circuses.
Carr also says
the current form of control is less invasive and hence less visible:
“What’s different, in comparison to the
physical world, is that acts of control, even as they grow much larger in
scale, become harder to detect and the wielders of control become more
difficult to discern.”
Again, there are
nudges and attempts to influence, but control is a pipedream.
Some would point
to the recent news that the US government has been accessing phone records and
possibly Internet access data via companies like Facebook, Google, Twitter and
Microsoft as proof of Carr’s argument. But here’s the problem with that
argument: the very same Internet companies refused to give data to the British
government. So why the difference? It’s rooted in the fact that all the big
Internet companies are American and hence can be arm twisted by the US
government (but not the British).
In other words,
it’s the government that is the bad guy here. Big surprise.
Comments
Post a Comment