Lego Minifigs

As a kid, my brother and I loved playing with Lego. Best toy ever, in my opinion. It’s been ages since I played with them last, which is perhaps why I missed this trend wrt Lego “minifigures” (that’s the term used to refer to those toy figures of Legoland; popularly shortened to “minifigs”). Apparently, the trend started in 1989 as per some study at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand: the minifigs shifted more and more to “scowling, frowning or snarling rather than smiling”. Have a look at this pic to see what they mean:


Wait, did I just say university study? Yup, that’s not a typo. Apparently, play is too important to be left to the kids (to paraphrase that famous saying about wars and generals). As this Telegraph article put it:
“The report is full of scatter graphs and tables that show the “results of the linear curve estimations across the six emotion categories” and a comically obtuse k-cluster analysis of spacemen versus cavemen characters… I kid you not.”

Ok, ok we believe you (Congrats, professor! You used enough high priest terms!). But why the shift in minifig expressions? “It is our impression that the themes have been increasingly based on conflicts,” say the authors of the paper. Apparently the trend accelerated as Lego focused on movie themes like Star Wars, Harry Potter and pirates. But wait a minute…so many of the imaginary scenes we played out as kids involved good guy v/s bad guy scenarios. We imagined those regardless of the minfig expression, didn’t we?

Methinks the study is crap…and I so agree with the way the Telegraph article ended:
“…if Lego needs inspiration for its next minifig, I suggest a pointed-headed academic, with an expression that makes him look like he’s been sucking on a lemon.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Why we Deceive Ourselves

Handling of the Satyam Scam