Karnataka Considered Job Reservation
The Karnataka government’s bill to reserve 75% in non-management jobs and 50% management jobs for “local candidates” was quickly put in hold. Raghu S Jaitley explained well why such an idea is “plain stupid and regressive”.
Reservation, he
says, makes sense if a group has been and continues to be discriminated for a
long time. It cannot be anybody’s case that the “youth of Karnataka have been
discriminated against for generations”!
Does Karnataka
have enough candidates with the appropriate skills or talent if such a bill
came into force? Obviously not (no state does). Companies will choose to exit
the state rather than “settle” for less.
Such a bill
disincentivizes the youth of Karnataka to do well in studies in the long run.
After all, they’d be guaranteed jobs. And once they got into jobs, would they
bother to upskill themselves? Obviously not. Progressively, the quality of the
labour force in Karnataka would drop, and more companies would exit.
Exceptions would
have to be made by the government. Thus opening another channel for corruption
and bribe seeking by government officials.
If many states
followed suit, well, Kannadigas wouldn’t be able to go work elsewhere. We’d be
moving in the direction of Balkanization. And global corporations would start
to tune out of India, when that happens.
Enforcing and
penalizing violations to such a law would consume additional resources of the
government. Instead of being put to providing badly needed services across the
state.
The obvious
solution?
“Creating
an enabling environment with good infrastructure, easier laws and a quality
labour market to help entrepreneurs create more jobs…”
But that is hard work. And it takes time to show results, even if done well. No wonder governments don’t try too hard on those fronts.
Comments
Post a Comment