The AI Future: Views of Two Countries

Hollywood is full of apocalyptic movies where the machines and AI takes over the world – the Terminator series is one of the best-known examples. In recent times, as machine learning algorithms get better at almost everything which seemed impossible just a few years back – recognizing faces, photos, transcribing and even translating spoken words in real-time – many people have been voicing their concerns, from Elon Musk to Bill Gates. There’s a term for it – the “singularity”. It’s the point of no return, at which technology takes over… for good.

 

On the other hand, China, which is second only to the US in all matters AI, doesn’t seem worried. In fact, tech entrepreneurs in China are optimistic that AI advances will make life better. Why the difference, asks Kai-Fu Lee in his book. For one, it’s their experience with technology so far:

“The Chinese government has long emphasized technological advances as key to China’s economic development… For the last forty years, Chinese people have watched as their country’s technological progress acted as the rising tide that lifted all boats.”

 

Sure, but can’t the Chinese see the societal risks as AI starts taking over more and more white-collar jobs, as self-driven vehicles make taxi, truck and train drivers redundant, and as AI powered robots take over jobs in manufacturing? Yes, but:

“There is a pervasive sense that the Chinese government will take care of all the displaced workers.”

What?! This belief is based on what happened during the 90’s, when China started a series of painful reforms to its bloated public sector companies. It was a brutal process that led to a large number of company closures, and associated job losses. But the country as a whole came out on a better track. More importantly, the government was able to help most of the laid off workers re-skill and find new jobs. Thus, the confidence that the government will manage the disruption that AI will cause.

 

This too then is an area of difference between the West and China – caution v/s optimism when it comes to what AI will bring.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn
Read more

Handling of the Satyam Scam

The Satyam scam. How does that fit into Montek Singh Ahluwalia’s book on reforms in India, Backstage ? The reason is that, as both NASSCOM and the government of India felt: “(Satyam’s) collapse would create a great deal of disruption for clients worldwide and seriously damage India’s reputation as a reliable source of software services.”   Therefore, the government decided to work with the private sector to “organize a quick takeover by a reputable new buyer, who would quickly restart the company”. But that could not be done overnight. In the meantime, the new board would have to reach out to Satyam’s clients and “reassure them that the company would survive”.   For the new board to have credibility when it made that statement, it had to be staffed with people who understood the private sector, the IT sector in particular, and commanded respect and trust. Deepak Parikh from HDFC was made chairman, and other members of the board included a former NASSCOM chairman, CII member,
Read more