Abundance of (Mis)Information
Abundance. The opposite of scarcity and shortage. While abundance may sound like a good thing, that’s only for some people, writes David Parell:
“Abundance
is a paradox. Environments of abundance are bad for the median consumer but
extremely good for a small number of conscious ones. Average consumers are
doomed to the tyranny of instinct. Meanwhile, consumers at the top are
propelled by unlimited access to nutritious food and information.”
The parallels
between abundance of food and information are revealing:
“The
parking lot was full of restaurants, but there were no healthy options.
Americans are overweight, not because of scarcity but because of abundance —
just like the news.”
While there’s
abundance of information on the Internet, he says, “the Internet makes it hard
to find nutrient-dense information”. You can find the junk food equivalent of
information effortlessly on the Net:
“On
the Internet, low-quality content drives out high-quality content, as the most
wide-read articles are polarizing and emotionally jarring. First, they distort
the truth by eliminating nuance and adding emotional charge to important
topics.”
And that’s the key
point: most articles do not seek to inform. Rather:
“If
you check almost any major publication, the most popular stories are
opinionated and fear-inducing. They draw us in because they sway our base-level
instincts in irresistible ways.”
As he rightly
warns:
“If
you serve as a mechanical slave to mass media and online algorithms, you’ll end
up with intellectual diabetes.”
But it’s not all
gloom and doom. After all:
“The
Internet is filled with high-quality information, so savvy information
consumers have access to more high-quality knowledge than at any point in human
history.”
The way out then?
For one, remind yourself that:
“Careful
consumers use the information at their fingertips to compound their wisdom
while compulsive ones drown in a volcano of fire-burning rage.”
And act as
follows:
“Skip the news cycle, but double-down on measured consumption.”
Comments
Post a Comment