Leave God out of It!


The investment bank, Goldman Sachs, draws its share of hatred and revulsion. Mostly (in)famously, it was described thus by Matt Taibbi:
“The world's most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”
A very graphic description indeed!

Like pretty much every other financial entity in the US, Goldman too received bailout money. Which, of course, added to the fury. It didn’t help that its CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, made his (in)famous comment to a reporter while coming out a government hearing on the financial crisis saying that he was “off to do God’s work”. Outrageous though it sounds, this was Blankfein’s version of the context in which he made the remark, as described in William D. Cohan’s book, Money and Power: How Goldman Sachs Came To Rule The World:
“So I walked out and I was talking to a reporter, and the questions were running along the lines of ‘How much did your tie cost?’ and ‘Do you know how much a quart of milk costs?’ And I knew where the trend was going, and as I was leaving, we’d gotten into a back and forth on the themes he was projecting, and I was leaving, I said and meant in an ironic way, ‘Now I’m off to do God’s work.’ He laughed, I laughed, but guess what? He got the last laugh.”

Isn’t it true that most people get very irritated when others invoke God into the stuff they do? Like Andre Agassi’s irritation with Michael Chang in his autobiography titled Open:
“Everytime he beats someone, he points to the sky. He thanks God – credits God – for the win, which offends me. That God should take sides in a tennis match, that God should side against me, that God should be in Chang’s box, feels ludicrous and insulting.”
Which is what made Agassi’s win even more satisfying:
“I beat Chang and savor every blasphemous stroke.”
You can see how much Chang’s habit pissed off Agassi, because elsewhere in the book he writes on a different match:
“I beat Chang in the final at Cincinnati, praise God.”
And in yet another part of the book, when he isn’t feeling confident:
“So I’ll lose today. Congratulations, Chang. I hope you and your Messiah will be very happy.”

I guess nothing gets the other side as worked up as claiming that God is on your side, whether it is in finance or in sports… or in morality.

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarMarch 16, 2018 at 11:27 AM

    Good one.

    The truth is many of us use God to add weight to whatever we want to assert. God becomes an instrument of our own puffed up ego, nothing more nothing less!

    As the blog ends with "finance or in sports… or in morality", I feel like asking why 'politics' is missing here. Religion is a way of socio-political assertion and domination. The Muslims have overdone it to a point of vexing others beyond limit and we can continue with how every other religion did their socio-political exertions and muscle twisting. Nowhere it is possible to reach a state of truly 'keeping politics religious twist free".

    Finally, I can't agree more with the finish - "morality" issue. Society definitely needs people's behavior in some conformity to suit the overall picture. Religions try to influence in behavior and political legal system try their methods towards the need. While both are bound to have flaws and limitations, religion can go about it with disgusting rigidity from time to time.

    The core truth is: the problem is with the way the human mind is wired. It seems to dilly dally with God forever; in that, some want God and also want all people to believe the same way of one's belief. While some others reject God and, sure enough, want all people to follow suit. Nothing much is going to change, as far as the 'wiring' goes; unless evolution does some trick! I would welcome it, since it all looks so arbitrary, while the muscle power seems to decide on issues.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn
Read more

Handling of the Satyam Scam

The Satyam scam. How does that fit into Montek Singh Ahluwalia’s book on reforms in India, Backstage ? The reason is that, as both NASSCOM and the government of India felt: “(Satyam’s) collapse would create a great deal of disruption for clients worldwide and seriously damage India’s reputation as a reliable source of software services.”   Therefore, the government decided to work with the private sector to “organize a quick takeover by a reputable new buyer, who would quickly restart the company”. But that could not be done overnight. In the meantime, the new board would have to reach out to Satyam’s clients and “reassure them that the company would survive”.   For the new board to have credibility when it made that statement, it had to be staffed with people who understood the private sector, the IT sector in particular, and commanded respect and trust. Deepak Parikh from HDFC was made chairman, and other members of the board included a former NASSCOM chairman, CII member,
Read more