Rebuilding Europe - 3: Cheating and Selling

Conclusion of the series based on the book, Saving a Continent.

As all the (Western) European nations got together in Paris to identify their collective needs for aid, one of the delegates admitted:
“Everybody cheated like hell in Paris. Everybody.”
Many asked for far more than what they used to produce before the war! Others “estimated” what they would need in future! Britain wanted to ensure that nobody used this as a way to leap ahead of Britain. The French were keen that Germany be made largely “pastoral” and suggested “pulling the heavy industrial teeth” of the Germans. Many countries tried to publicly announce their lists as “final”, hoping to embarrass and force the US into agreeing to what the US contemptuously called their “shopping lists”.

The Americans retaliated by telling the Europeans bluntly that they abandon their customary “nationalistic approach”, accept some “infringement on their sovereignty” and to come to terms with the fact that “certain basic changes which have occurred and are contributing to their international positions”. The loss of their colonial empires wasn’t helping either. America also pushed for customs union within Europe, to ease trade and recovery while also making it easy for their own exports. The seeds for the EU had been sown. The Americans also decided to stop the de-Nazification of Germany: qualified individuals must fill the right jobs. Future economic growth was more important than past war crimes. The US also ensured that American money to build Europe would be used to buy (mostly) US and Western European items, not Canadian or South American.

As the needs of the Europeans began to solidify, President Truman had begun to work on ways to get support in government for this massive aid plan. It was not an easy sell at all. Hard questions were asked:
-         Why change from being isolationist to getting involved in global affairs?
-         Why pay for Germany, until recently the enemy they had fought?
-         How much was all this going to cost?
-         What was the benefit to the US, and more specifically, to the constituents of the politician who was going to vote on the aid package?
-         Was the communist threat really that serious?
The government answered these and many others, often tailoring the answers to suit the politician in question, and also appealed on humanitarian grounds. Truman called the vote the “greatest decision in our history”.

While politicians are prone to hyperbole, that Yes vote by the US for aid to rebuild Europe did indeed have monumental consequences that played out over the next half-century. And yet, how many people even know of the US President behind all this? That’s the fate of the peacetime leader throughout history.

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarNovember 13, 2017 at 12:47 PM

    This block is informative; and, much about these are not told and shared by people. This also shows the way US was steadily emerging as a world player, knowing the US and the USSR became the polar ends of power for a long time to come, after the World War II.

    Yes, it is true that those politicians who did have vision and whose acts were far-reaching find very little mention. While many na-laayaks ensure their names will be for roads, airports, institutions, bus-stands, statues and so on. Laayak or na-laayak, definitely in India there is political sales-talk in great abundance. Surprisingly, there are many 'who have been had' by the sales talk! Acts hardly are in proportion to the sales talk though, but then politics is not a domain where truth is priority - quite unlike the sciences.

    Considering all that, I would certainly admit that Truman's approach is praise-worthy.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more