Where are we Headed?
In a world where
political correctness has gone overboard and everyone seems to be corrupt, a
backlash was inevitable. Is being
obnoxious the oral version of that backlash, wonders Santosh Desai:
“The idea of truth has become so severely
compromised that professed strength is seen to be a substitute for it. In a
world where everyone is deemed corrupt, calling other people names without any
restraint becomes decoded as a sign of honesty.”
But why is
obnoxious so appealing to us?
“The directness, the uncomplicated self
absorption, and the primitive nature of the promise combine to create a
compelling force that we find easy to give in to… the most important reason for
the success of the obnoxious is that they are always entertaining.”
Entertainment:
it’s been what the masses wanted ever since the time of the gladiators, bread
and circuses!
In another blog,
Desai wonders if this is just a transition
phase of democracy, caused by social media:
“Social media, by giving voice to the
millions who were earlier forced only to listen, has deepened democratic
participation while simultaneously enabling a shallower political discourse.”
Some believe
that “as we discover the costs of our (social media) freedoms… some of rabid
beaviour on display will get toned down”.
Logically
speaking, why was it OK when the pre-Internet media (publishing, radio, TV) got
to decide the topics of the debate, and pontificate on what was good and right?
Does that lead to this very scary proposition:
“If we were to accept this axis of
analysis, then it could be argued that liberalism and the idea of modernity
that drives it is not an inevitable progression based on the human instinct for
freedom, but a development contingent on what the dominant media form of the
time is.”
How will this
storm created by the Internet + social media play out? Nobody can say for sure,
says Desai. But because the stakes are so high, it’s still worth thinking
about:
“It is too soon to imagine what kind of
changes lie in store, for the codes of a digitally powered society are still in
the process of being formed… It is not a comforting thought, which is why it is
worth thinking about.”
A little strange blog from you because you usually quote more than one author! Here Santosh Desai dominates.
ReplyDeleteMost points are valid.
As to the point, "Why was it OK when the pre-Internet media (publishing, radio, TV) got to decide the topics of the debate, and pontificate on what was good and right?"I have this to say. Who says it was all OK? Then also people were feeling some things were wrong in that. However, in our younger days, the media was not a real devil that it is today. There was less manipulation, less overdoing, less commercialism, less shouting down. It was a lot milder than today, because it was not a competitive world then of the to the level of today's cut-throatism then.
Well, we all know every solution leads to a problem. So let's live our day as it is. Though some may feel today's world offers more elements for lament, truly speaking that is not the case. World forever was a mixture of good, bad, neutral ingredients in it. And it will be so in the future too, unless somebody has proof otherwise.