Smart Everything Isn’t Necessarily a Good Thing
All those smart
devices seem to have taken the next step. Whether for good or bad is a matter
of opinion though. With the falling price of sensors, almost every item can be
fitted with one. Add a piece of software, often free, and you could be “seeing
social engineering disguised as product engineering”. Huh? Take BinCam, a good
old trash bin fitted with a smartphone on the top lid. When you drop stuff into
the bin, it takes a pic, sends it to Mechanical Turk where freelancers check if
your garbage proves whether or not you really care for the environment! And eventually,
your photo appears on your Facebook page…to shame you.
At least the BinCam
is voluntary, you might say. And the idea is positive: to shame you into being
better. Similar ideas include smart scales that tweet your weight online to add
pressure on you to stick to that diet; smart medicine bottles that ping you and
your doc if you aren’t taking that medication; smart forks that tell you are
eating too fast and smart toothbrushes that tell you to brush for longer.
And then there’s
the potential that all this smartness goes over to the dark side. Like that
smart sensor in the car that warns that you are driving too fast or braking too
hard can also tomorrow transmit the info to the insurance company. Who may then
jack up your premium. Who’s to say that once a critical mass of such drivers is
reached that we won’t find insurance companies penalizing drivers who don’t have such sensors? It’s a slippery
slope to Big Brother, isn’t it?
Which is why Evgeny
Morozov defines “good
smart” where you only get suggestions but are still free to do what you want
and “bad smart” which practically makes certain choices impossible. When John
Stuart Mill wrote these lines in On
Liberty:
“the only purpose for which power can be
rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his
will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or mental, is
not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear
because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier,
because, in the opinion of others, to do so would be wise, or even right”
he was talking
about governments. Today we may be standing on the brink of Big Data and
companies being able to do the same. And Mill’s arguments would apply equally
against corporations as well, wouldn’t it?
Comments
Post a Comment