Half Robin Hood’s
In earlier times
when the only way to get rich was by being evil or corrupt, the criminals that
the audiences could support were variants of Robin Hood: guys who robbed from
the (criminal) rich and gave it to the poor.
Modern day
stories and movies are a bit greyer and so the reason that the audience would
still root for the “bad guy” became something personal about the criminal. You
support Ocean’s Eleven (apart from
the fact that it includes George Clooney and Brad Pitt) because it’s the
robbing of a jerk who has also “stolen” Clooney’s girlfriend. The Italian Job is about a bunch of
thieves who want to take revenge on their ex-partner who betrayed them and
killed their boss. And so on.
And now there is
Special 26. Akshay Kumar and his gang
of conmen have no noble motive; they’re not right’ing any wrongs; and they
they’re half Robin Hood’s: they steal from the rich, but don’t give to the
poor. Their victims are chosen not because they are corrupt (which they are)
but because that very corruption prevents them from reporting the theft of
their black money!
Interesting that
a Bollywood movie bypassed all those formula justifications for the criminals
and still made us want the bad guys to win at the end of the movie!
Comments
Post a Comment