Preamble #7: Dignity

Dignity. There is that (in)famous incident of Gandhi being thrown out from the first-class carriage of a train in South Africa. It led Gandhi to write that Indians had “become the untouchables of South Africa”, says Aakash Singh Rathore in Ambedkar’s Preamble.

 

It took a “real” untouchable, Ambedkar, to point out that the discrimination Indians faced abroad, while routine and condemnable, was a false analogy to what the untouchables faced in India. After all, pointed out Ambedkar, in South Africa, Gandhi was the boss of several white employees. He had whites as house guests, he dined with white South Africans, he owned property and handled significant amounts of money. Contrast that with what untouchables experienced and suffered back home, pointed out Ambedkar. Hence the charge of the false analogy. As Rathore says:

“Only a visa got Dr Ambedkar out of this hostile land that was his homeland, so he could travel abroad, far from the dominion of Brahmanism, and only then enjoy the liberation of not being an untouchable.”

No wonder Ambedkar’s autobiographical writing is called Waiting for a Visa.

 

The villages were the worst on this front, urban life slightly better for an untouchable. Yet Gandhi romanticized the village to the chagrin of Ambedkar.

“Gandhism does not mind these consequences in the least.”

It was all this that drove Ambedkar to add “dignity” side by side with “fraternity” in the Preamble (requoting that line from the earlier blog on fraternity):

Fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the Nation.”

Without dignity, there could be no unity of the nation.

 

The Irish preamble was also considered as source material. While features like fraternity, dignity and unity of the nation were parts of the Irish one, other aspects like invocations to Jesus and the Divine Lord were huge turnoffs for the members of India’s constituent assembly – the Irish preamble sounded “more like a liturgical prayer than a legal document”!

 

Ambedkar led temple entry movements from as far back as the 1930’s. Why? Here is his answer (as always articulate):

“Entry into the Ram Temple… will not bring about any radical change to our life. But this is a test to judge… whether the Hindu mind is willing the accept the elevated aspirations of the new era that man must be treated as man… human dignity should be established.”

 

It is evident that lots of clauses and features of the Indian Constitution are rooted in the deep and core values as well as the experiences of Ambedkar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nazis and the Physics Connection

Need for an Informed Aadhar Debate

Europe #3 - Innsbruck