The Number 'e'

The mathematical number ‘e’ has a celebrity status in maths, writes Steven Strogatz in The Joy of x:

“A few numbers are such celebrities that they go by single-letter stage names, something not even Madonna… can match.”

 

That line got me thinking. Why did it take me a very long to understand why ‘e’ is such a famous number? I mean, I am an engineer and all those years of maths and physics prior to that meant I had run into ‘e’ in all kinds of places. Within maths itself, the “natural” logarithm is to the base ‘e’, not 10, but that I dismissed as an arbitrary human choice. But I could also see ‘e’ in real world phenomenon, from the charging of a capacitor and inductor to the rate of radioactive decay.

 

I’d always dismissed ‘e’ popping up in all kind of real world phenomenon as a coincidence. I mean, my idea of ‘e’ was based on how schools introduce ‘e’. Via an equation that seems contrived:

How can the occurrence of such a ridiculously defined number popping up everywhere in the real world be anything but a coincidence?

 

The answer lies, as with so many things, in calculus. Which being a complex topic is taught much later. And so unfortunately, we get introduced to ‘e’ via the above equation, which creates an impression of ‘e’ being a weird, contrived number.

 

But looked at from a calculus perspective, you realize ‘e’ can be defined in a way that immediately explains why ‘e’ pops up everywhere in the real world. In calculus, ‘e’ is defined as the rate of growth of something that grows continuously:


Ignore the mathematical representation. Focus instead on the verbal definition: if something grows continuously, ‘e’ is the rate at which it would grow. And suddenly it all fits. A capacitor charges continuously. A radioactive element decays continuously.

 

Not just in those two examples. Since most change in the world is continuous/bit-by-bit change, no wonder ‘e’ shows up everywhere in the real world. Ergo, its celebrity status.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn
Read more

Handling of the Satyam Scam

The Satyam scam. How does that fit into Montek Singh Ahluwalia’s book on reforms in India, Backstage ? The reason is that, as both NASSCOM and the government of India felt: “(Satyam’s) collapse would create a great deal of disruption for clients worldwide and seriously damage India’s reputation as a reliable source of software services.”   Therefore, the government decided to work with the private sector to “organize a quick takeover by a reputable new buyer, who would quickly restart the company”. But that could not be done overnight. In the meantime, the new board would have to reach out to Satyam’s clients and “reassure them that the company would survive”.   For the new board to have credibility when it made that statement, it had to be staffed with people who understood the private sector, the IT sector in particular, and commanded respect and trust. Deepak Parikh from HDFC was made chairman, and other members of the board included a former NASSCOM chairman, CII member,
Read more