Nero

Mention the Roman emperor, Nero, and the response will probably be “fiddling” (while Rome burnt). But of course, like all Roman history, Nero’s tale has so many other parts to it, as I found via this Hourly History book.

 

Nero, from age 4, was raised by his aunt. His father had died, and his mother, Agrippina, was exiled for treason against the emperor of the time, Caligula. When Caligula died, Agrippina was allowed to return to Rome. She set her eyes on the new emperor, Claudius, to secure her own as well as her son’s prospects…

 

Agrippina decided to marry the emperor even though she was his niece – but the Senate wouldn’t allow incestuous relations. Agrippina didn’t let that get in her way – she convinced Claudius to pass legislation to OK her marriage to him. Next, she got Nero to marry the emperor’s daughter from his previous marriage. And she browbeat the emperor to declare Nero, not his older son from the earlier marriage, as his successor. The stage was thus set for Nero.

 

When Claudius died, Nero became emperor at the age of 16. He was soon smitten by a commoner woman. Agrippina was having none of this “wild whim of youth”. And she criticized him for it. As their differences increased over time, Agrippina became desperate and cast her support for the deceased emperor’s son. Nero had her removed from the palace.

 

As Agrippina lost favour, power and influence, her enemies came out poisoning Nero’s mind with other stories of his mother’s betrayals. He wanted to execute her, but was dissuaded by his advisors. But when his mother continued to criticize him for his affairs, he finally decided to kill her in an “accident” at sea. His mother, however, survived that. Only to be killed by soldiers sent by Nero.

 

Reads like a masala movie, right? And what about that infamous fire of Rome, the one where he fiddled? Some believe he wanted to raze parts of Rome to make room for new constructions he had in mind. Others question that since one of his own palaces too got destroyed. Regardless of the truth, Nero decided he wouldn’t take the blame. And his scapegoats became the Christians of Rome, many of who were tortured and killed setting of one of the worst pogroms of the era.

 

His extravagances and the cost of rebuilding (burnt) Rome forced him to raise taxes, a measure that made him very unpopular. So he decided to increase taxes farther away, in Israel. That move, in turn, set off a revolt in Israel, which was then crushed brutally by the Romans.

 

Is this why historians paint such a negative picture of the man? Was he really worse than other despots of the era? Or has history been written by the descendants of massacred Christians and Jews, with an axe to grind?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire ...
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more