Cards Close to the Chest

As the cash crunch in ATM’s and banks continued, Modi’s reasons for demonetization kept changing. Initially, it was about black money; then about counterfeiting; and then it was about going cashless. Did it sound like he was cooking up a new reason each time?

Or take the (alleged) Russian hacking of the recent US Presidential election. Did Putin & Co do that to help Trump win? Or did they do it as revenge against Hillary who, in 2011, accused Putin of rigging the Russian election? The US media finds a new reason each time…

Or how about Nitish Kumar’s support for demonetization? Did he genuinely mean it? Or was it a signal to the electorate that he too is against corruption? Or was it a signal to the BJP that he is not averse to joining forces with them, if mutually acceptable terms are worked out?

We tend to believe that politicians can’t have multiple reasons for their policies, actions and statements. What if that were not true, at least for the ones at or near the top? What if the answer to the questions above on the reasons for Modi, Putin and Nitish’s actions were “All of the above”?

But, you say, if that were the case, why don’t they give all their reasons upfront? Why cite a new one periodically?

Perhaps Daniel Kahneman has the answer to that, though he was talking of organizations and their reluctance to “implementing programs that would improve the rationality of their decisions”:
“Well because it creates difficulty for the leadership. The moment you have a system that is a more structured system – then that system can be used to second guess the decisions of people. And people don’t like to be second guessed. So there is a lot of interest in ways to improve rationality but … when it comes to implementation enthusiasm wanes distinctly. … because you are naked and this is a real problem.”

If you show the people all your cards, they will find reasons to critique your choices. To paraphrase that old saying, it’s better to hide your reasons and let people wonder what your motives are than to cite them all and let them butcher your choice, point by point…

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire ...
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more