Where is Everybody?
When NASA
discovered Earth 2.0, it was big news:
“(The planet named) Kepler 452b orbits a
star similar to our sun, and at about the same distances as Earth orbits the
sun, meaning it has a similar length year and exists in the “habitable zone”
where liquid water can exist on a planet.”
We’ve now found more
than 1,900 exoplanets (planets outside our solar system) and SETI has been
scanning the skies for so long, but hey, where are the aliens?
This
contradiction (expected probability of finding life in a universe this big v/s
never having found signs of alien life) is called the Fermi Paradox. There are
many explanations that are given (all involving probabilities; so I won’t bore
you with the details), but I found this one
by Karl Schroeder interesting:
“Either advanced alien civilizations
don’t exist, or we can’t see them because they are indistinguishable from
natural systems. I vote for the latter.”
And so he says:
“If the Fermi Paradox is a profound
question, then this answer is equally profound. It amounts to saying that the
universe provides us with a picture of the ultimate end-point of technological
development. In the Great Silence, we see the future of technology, and it lies
in achieving greater and greater efficiencies, until our machines approach the
thermodynamic equilibria of their environment, and our economics is replaced by
an ecology where nothing is wasted. After all, SETI is essentially a search for
technological waste products: waste heat, waste light, waste electromagnetic
signals. We merely have to posit that successful civilizations don't produce
such waste, and the failure of SETI is explained.”
Or as Kevin Kelly paraphrases
it:
“His theory suggest that what technology
wants is to be “natural,” not just biologically natural, but geologically natural.”
Their technology
became one with nature. Or rather, one with the entire universe. Doesn’t that
remind you of Hinduism/Buddhism…except it talks about the ultimate end “goal”
of technology rather than humans?
So I guess we
don’t need to worry about the robot overlords that will take over our planet
eventually: after all, they’re headed the same way as us: to be one with
nature!
Very interesting view. What's more, it is relevant to where we are today.
ReplyDeleteI particularly welcome the point about "So I guess we don’t need to worry about the robot overlords that will take over our planet eventually: after all, they’re headed the same way as us: to be one with nature!" [Needless to add that I am usually an admirer of your finish lines!]
Like you said, why fear technology and science? In Japan, people do not believe science and religion are in conflict. Their religions have less of God discussion fortunately, and the stress is more on the need for the individual human mind to subordinate (stating differently, toning down individual ego for the sake of the society). It helps. Thus, I would also believe that modern science and technology also show us the way to harmony with nature, if that is the core truth. Nobody questions science has commitment to truth as it is. [I wish religions follow this motto too: full commitment to truth only and not the dogmas.]