Toast to the Villains
The latest
season of Sherlock was terrible: the
attempt to make Holmes a bit more human fell on its face; the plots were non-existent;
and most important of all, there was no James Moriarty. As this article
says:
“Indeed, a truly great superhero comic is
defined by the quality of the villains. Batman has the Joker; Superman has Lex
Luthor; Spider-Man has Doc Ock; Iron Man has the Mandarin. In each of those
cases (and many more), the best villains have become just as legendary as their
corresponding heroes, and are almost always more interesting.”
To this list, I
would add: Sherlock Holmes has James Moriarty; and Harry Potter has Lord
Voldemort. In any case, aren’t they like the yin and yang? Or as Moriarty puts
it:
“We're just alike, you and I, except
you're boring. You're on the side of the angels.”
Great villains
don’t just liven up “banal stories about (heroes) saving the day and getting
the girl while simultaneously standing for truth, justice, and the American
way”; they even make you like them. This guy with the handle Grimsrasatoas puts
it perfectly on Reddit about Moriarty:
“i actually love his character. not in
the "I love villainy/evil" way, but the fact that he's so diabolical
and everything he does is insane.”
Remember John
Travolta in Broken Arrow?
The best
villains don’t narrate their wicked plots like they do in Hindi movies. They
are too smart for that. As Adrian Veidt said in Ozymandias:
“I'm not a comic book villain. Do you
seriously think I would explain my master stroke to you if there were even the
slightest possibility you could affect the outcome?”
JK Rowling
surely agrees: remember how Dumbledore had to explain the Dark Lord’s actions
to Harry Potter at the end of every book?
Besides, don’t
heroes sometimes invoke envy, something Harvey Dent warned Batman about:
“You either die a hero or you live long
enough to see yourself become the villain.”
Moriarty
implemented that very idea in the adapted TV series when he turned the public (and
police) against Holmes. In Moriarty’s own words:
“Sir Boast-a-lot was the bravest and
cleverest knight of the round table but soon the other knights began to grow
tired of his stories about how many dragons he’d slain. And soon they began to
wonder “Are Sir Boast-a-lot’s stories even true?” Ohhhh noooo. So all of the
knights went to King Arthur and said “I don’t believe Sir Boast-a-lot’s
stories! He’s just a big old liar who makes things up to make himself look
good.” And then even the King began to wonder…”
Sony Pictures
seems to agree with the importance (and commercial potential) of the bad guy.
Recently, they decided to make two films centered on Spiderman’s villains, Venom
and the Sinister Six.
And like Benicio
Del Toro said, don’t the best villains provide potential for sequels?
“Villains used to always die in the end.
Even the monsters. Frankenstein, Dracula - you'd kill them with a stake. Now
the nightmare guy comes back.”
Look no farther
than Lord Voldemort to see what he means.
Now, if only they
resurrect (it’s so much fun to use the word for the bad guy!) James Moriarty
and make the next season of Sherlock
come to life...
Comments
Post a Comment