Drugs on the Silk Road

Scott Adams puts this disclaimer at the top of some of his blogs:
“This blog is written for a rational audience that likes to have fun wrestling with unique or controversial points of view. It is written in a style that can easily be confused as advocacy for one sort of unpleasantness or another.”
Consider the same to be applicable to this blog before you read on…

The Internet currency, Bitcoins, that I wrote about a couple of months back, was the currency of choice on The Silk Road: a black market web site for “illegal narcotics, fake documents, hackers-for-hire and other illicit goods”.

So how did it work? Like eBay! Users logged in, searched a catalog, checked out the ratings by previous buyers, paid in Bitcoins and the stuff would get mailed to their address while the money was held in an escrow account.  The FBI recently shut down the site and arrested its mastermind, Ross William Ulbricht.

Which should be a good thing, right? Except you should check out Conor Friedersdorf’s question as to whether such an Internet based black market may be the lesser evil compared to its physical world counterpart, at least in case of drugs. Like take this point:
“The purchase could be made without ever …going to see him in some potentially dangerous location, or inviting him over.”
Isn’t it better worse for drug users to not risk physical injury while buying?

Or how about the chance to evaluate a dealer for product quality, an eternal risk with drugs on the street:
“User reviews meant the product was a known quantity.”

Consider the full implication of this statement in the FBI complaint sheet:
“Based on the postal markings on the packages in which the drugs arrived, these purchases appear to have been filled by vendors located in over ten different countries...”
If you didn’t get it (I certainly didn’t), let Friedersdorf elaborate. Think of the list of people in the equivalent physical world supply chain:
“Armed truck drivers, bribed customs agents, desperate drug mules, thuggish regional distributors, and street level drug dealers who used guns to defend their territory”
Did the site reduce the number of people involved in illegal activities?!

Note that Friedersdorf is only asking these questions in the drugs context. He does not advocate this view for any and all illegal goods and services that were traded on The Silk Road. If people will take drugs anyway (and they will), was this a better system (for everyone involved, including bystanders who might get killed in related gang wars) than the physical world system?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn
Read more

Handling of the Satyam Scam

The Satyam scam. How does that fit into Montek Singh Ahluwalia’s book on reforms in India, Backstage ? The reason is that, as both NASSCOM and the government of India felt: “(Satyam’s) collapse would create a great deal of disruption for clients worldwide and seriously damage India’s reputation as a reliable source of software services.”   Therefore, the government decided to work with the private sector to “organize a quick takeover by a reputable new buyer, who would quickly restart the company”. But that could not be done overnight. In the meantime, the new board would have to reach out to Satyam’s clients and “reassure them that the company would survive”.   For the new board to have credibility when it made that statement, it had to be staffed with people who understood the private sector, the IT sector in particular, and commanded respect and trust. Deepak Parikh from HDFC was made chairman, and other members of the board included a former NASSCOM chairman, CII member,
Read more