A Book is Not a Straight Line


My dad has this habit of reading non-fiction in, well, random order. He will read a passage here; skip to a totally different part of the book, read a piece there and so on. That approach never made any sense to me; and I assumed he did that because the topic or style of writing of most books didn’t appeal enough for him to want to read all of it.

Recently I heard of this proposal by Linda Holliday, the CEO of a digital publishing company called Semi-Linear with her “a book is not a straight line” philosophy:
“Holliday threw up her hands, wishing to dispel “the myth that a book is a straight line, or a string of pages,” as publishers see it. “Nonfiction is a constellation of ideas that you have to string into a straight line,” she said. Holliday envisions a Pinterest-type board, where readers could post their favorite cards. “They might read pieces of hundreds of thousands of books, and not one whole book,” she said. “Is that so bad?”

Against which Alan Jacobs argued:
“(many topics) are complicated, entangled, interrelated, and for a society to thrive it needs to have many people — not all, but many — who have the patience and concentration to work through long narratives and arguments.”

What Jacobs says is true indeed. Then again, with complicated ideas, shouldn’t we want to hear different (preferably even opposing) perspectives before making up our minds? Instead of reading just one narrative that stitches the information together in the way that particular author thought? Because, let’s face it: most of us will never read two different books on the same complicated topic to get two different perspectives.

So I am in Holliday’s camp on this one. Apparently my dad’s been in that camp for a long while!

Comments

  1. This kind of (random) reading actually helps in even serious subjects like physics, for example. It may be a good idea to keep reading randomly from the physics book, when not preparing for the course or test or the exam of course. One starts feeling a sense of familiarity, even if vague, about the broad aspects that the subject would deal with. In other words. It may be OK to develop a bird's eye view of the subject, so to speak, without even having much of a capacity to fly to start with! :-)

    I can draw a parallel in the world of Art. For a good artist, the canvas need not be blank when he starts with some painting. It can have patches of the anticipatory strokes of the artist which may transform and culminate into a great painting later on.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch