Art
Art. I thought its purpose is beauty, aesthetics. Not always, writes Sam Kahn. Once upon a time, it served another purpose: “The presumption is that art must shock—that the violation of taboo is what gives art its charge; and that, actually, shock and the overturning of societal norms is art’s highest purpose.” Art-as-subversion later turned into art-as-a-call-to-arms: “Somewhere in the 19 th century the notion develops that a work of art can be most effective when it’s ugly , when it deeply mirrors certain social realities and presents them in such a way that the audience is spurred to immediate action.” This became the norm to such an extent that: “Great art was linked to revolutionary politics, or at least to a certain revolutionary spirit, so that every significant work of art was assessed in large part by its ‘influence,’ which really meant its ability to serve as a wrecking ball to various social norms.” So much so that: “Works of art are always hailed as ‘revolutionary,’...