Robert Boyle: Beyond the Gas Law


The scientist, Robert Boyle, is famous for the gas law named after him. But he contributed to far more things in science, writes Paul Strathern in his wonderful history of chemistry, Mendeleyev’s Dream.

For starters, he revived the atomic theory. Almost everyone agreed that that since gases could be compressed (without any increase in their weight), it implied that “gases consisted of particles separated by a void”. Boyle extended the reasoning as follows: the “particles separated by a void” principle should apply to water vapour, a gas. Therefore, shouldn’t the same principle apply to water in liquid and solid states as well? And if it applied to water in all states, shouldn’t it apply to all substances? And thus was revived the atomic theory.

Boyle also defined what an element is: anything that could not be broken down into a simpler substance. But this definition had a problem:
“When a substance was found to be an element, this could only be a provisional state of affairs. It was always possible that someone would find a way of breaking down the substance still further.”

But Boyle didn’t stop there. He came to the (wrong) conclusion that metals were not elements. Ergo, it followed:
“If metals were not primary substances, one could be broken into its constituent elements and reassembled – or transmuted – into another. Lead could become silver, silver could become gold.”
And thus Boyle too “caught the alchemy bug”!

Today, we laugh at those who believed in alchemy. But through the ages, people believed it was possible. After all, so many substances changed into other things, so why couldn’t some things change into gold? If true, it was literally the road to untold riches (literally). And so the subject was deliberately garbled by alchemists through the ages: why make it easy for others to understand or read one’s notes on the subject?
“The blend of mysticism, the initiated, secret knowledge and the prospect of unlimited reward – this heady brew fulfils a primeval need.”
On the other hand, if alchemy was possible, it could ruin economies (it’s like the ability to print money!). And so many kings had banned alchemy for exactly that reason. Including Henry III of England.

Given his “alchemy bug”, what did Boyle do?
“He even used his influence in the Royal Society to press for repeal of the anti-alchemy law.”
Parliament repealed the law in 1689. And Boyle immediately encouraged scientists to “pursue this important quest”.

Oh well, at least Boyle’s “alchemical pursuits had a smidgeon of theoretical scientific justification”. Suddenly alchemy doesn’t sound so stupid, does it?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more