Viswanathan K's Thoughts

Kids love slime. As if the bodily version wasn’t enough, there are toys with names like “Barrels O Slime”. The slime in each barrel comes in a different color. Yuck, you say? One’s man revolted reaction is another man’s marketing opportunity. So we have Yucky Science kits (yes, there is such a category) like Galaxy Glitter Crunchy Slime Making Kit . I guess different colors weren’t enough, the world was missing slime that could glitter. And be crunchy. You’d think my daughter would have been thrilled to get a kit like this. But no. Turns out her friend had already tried out a YouTube video to make slime. And failed. It won’t work, proclaimed the other kid with the pleasure that comes from dashing someone’s hopes. As far as a kid is concerned, in a parents v/s friends opinion contest, the friend knows best. Not one to accept defeat, my wife pretty much forced my daughter into trying the kit out. And boy, did it work. I am guessing the ingredients were perfect because she mixe

Scientists are usually poor at people skills and at communicating things. The way they see it, the data and equations should speak for themselves. But that very skill becomes critical when a scientist comes up with a theory that is revolutionary and threatens to up-end the existing system. Take Max Planck, the man who founded quantum mechanics. It was easy for Planck to go ahead with his theory though it was revolutionary not because Planck was a great communicator but because he himself was reluctant to accept the implications of his own theory! Which is why Planck is always called the “reluctant revolutionary”. Not so was Ludwig Boltzmann. In an age when physics had been repeatedly proven to be deterministic and predictable since the time of Newton, Boltzmann said certain aspects were merely probabilistic. He insisted he was right and argued vehemently about it, but few at the time agreed and it caused Boltzmann no end of anguish and frustration. (He was eventually proven

Einstein made thought experiments famous. But he wasn’t the man who invented the concept. So what is a thought experiment? Based on certain assumption(s), you go over the logical consequences it would lead to. As Shane Parrish wrote : “The purpose is to encourage speculation, logical thinking and to change paradigms. Thought experiments push us outside our comfort zone by forcing us to confront questions we cannot answer with ease.” So who came up with the first recorded instance of a thought experiment? Not surprisingly, it was the Greek Zeno back in 430 BC. He used it to “prove” that motion is an illusion. Huh? His logic was this: assume the tortoise is 100 m ahead of the hare. When the hare covers the 100 m gap, the tortoise would have moved a bit ahead. When the tortoise covers that second gap, the tortoise would have moved a little bit ahead. And so on it goes. How then could the hare ever catch up with the tortoise, asked Zeno. What was the flaw in his reasoning? Galil

CRISPR, the gene editing tool, allows for the editing of specific genes. The keyword is “specific”. To understand the point, think of breeding racehorses. While one gets to pick the “best” horses to breed, one has no control over which genes the child will inherit. That part’s still a roll of the genetic dice. But with CRISPR, one can target and edit specific genes. The level of control is unprecedented. And scary. Will it lead to the assembly line production of humans “superior” on whatever parameter we choose? Can we anticipate long term consequences of any such changes? Or would it be too late by the time we discover side-effects? Only time will tell how we decide to self-regulate ourselves with such powers. And how successfully those rules are enforced. The one area where it might seem that the benefits would outweigh the risks is when it comes to fixing genetic diseases. But that raises an existential question for pharma and biotech companies, what Goldman Sachs asks i

As part of the way to make kids comfortable with speaking in front of an audience, my daughter’s school has these periodic sessions where every kid has to speak for about a minute to the entire class holding a placard on the topic. Recently, the topic was any mathematician of their choice. Huh? -          How does a kid in 2 nd standard know about any mathematician (or “mathematic” as my daughter calls it)?! The only mathematician I know who did anything that a kid could understand was Gauss… as a kid, he found a smart way to add all the numbers from 1 to 100, an assignment his teacher had given. -          And what can one draw on a placard about a mathematician? Equations? Given the placard problem, I picked Alan Turing as the guy she could talk about. Come to think of it, all the points she used for her talk were about his work around computing, not maths! 1)       He was a mathematician and a computer scientist; 2)      The machine he created to decode the f

Check out old photos of most Indians, and you’ll see that they didn’t know how to smile for the camera. They either didn’t smile at all, or they had a very tortured expression attempting to smile. Things have changed only after social media and selfies took over everyone’s lives. But even before social media, the expression of Indians in photos stood in sharp contrast to that of Americans. Seth Stephens-Davidowitz makes an interesting observation in his best-seller, Everybody Lies : “(Americans) went from nearly stone-faced at the start of twentieth century to beaming by the end. So why the change? Did Americans get happier?” Nope, wrong answer. The correct answer is far more interesting. Even better, it starts by answering a question most of us didn’t even think about! The first part answers why they had such serious looks to begin with: “When photographs were first invented, people thought of them like paintings. There was nothing else to compare them to. Thus, subject

Kids in a car will drive you up a wall by asking the question, “Are we there yet?”. Every 2 minutes. And that’s if you are lucky; more often, they’ll ask the same question again within a minute. Is that because they’re so damned impatient and so easily bored? Or is it just not possible for kids to visualize distances or the passage of time? The point hit me when my daughter was watching this cartoon about 2 naughty school kids, Badrinath aur Buddhadev . The class was told that there’d be a 5 km marathon, upon which one kid promptly responded: “Just 5 km? What’s there in that? I can run that much in just 5 minutes.” Most adults immediately know that’s impossible. But if you step back to see how adults know that, it’s not because we can visualize the distance of 5 km or the amount of time 5 minutes implies. Rather, our brain uses the proxy called “speed” to assess the claim: 5 km in 5 min means a km per minute, which is 60 kmph. Cars go at that speed, not humans, therefore th

Come board exams time, there is the usual criticism of all the pressure being heaped on students, and how many of them are unable to cope with it. Manika Ghosh criticizes the government “solution” to this issue. Sure, it’s a new solution each year, but the common thread across the years? “It appears to be a grandiose, knee-jerk idea at best for solving a complex, multidimensional problem.” All this reminds me of this experiment from Robert Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance , wherein the narrator decides to do away with grades in a college course that he teaches. What follows is very revealing not just about the universities and schools but also teachers and the holy cow that cannot be criticized, at least not publicly: students. Let’s start with how a gradeless system is scary for universities and schools: “The real University is a state of mind… There’s a legal entity which is unfortunately called by the same name but is quite another thing… It is just

The few Israelis from the workplace that I’ve interacted with were all very proud of their country’s technical prowess and their start-up culture that is second only to Silicon Valley. Yet, for all the great relationship that US and Israel enjoy as nations, most of those very same Israelis would curse the US for buying their start-ups and thus ending up taking the credit for those ideas. Because till the Israelis own it, it’s a local player; but once Google or Apple buys it, the whole world knows of that company! Turns out this feeling runs quite deep in Israel beyond just the handful I interacted with: Israelis used to admire Nokia a lot during its peak. Why? A small country built a global technology giant. If the Finns could do it, why can’t we, they asked? But, as this article points out , maybe the Israelis are better off not having a Nokia of their own. Here’s why. While Apple, the world’s most valuable company, is worth only 0.5% of the US GDP, Nokia was worth 20% of F

“Because I said so”. It’s a phrase every parent uses with their kids. In an ideal world, we wouldn’t need to pull rank, but we don’t live in an ideal world: -          Some things are just too complicated to explain to a kid; -          Sometimes we’re not in a mood; -          There’s no time to get into all that; -          And last but not least, kids can be a pain deliberately . Pretending not to understand, testing how far they can push you, enjoying asking “Why” to whatever you say. And then there’s this other reason I stumbled upon based on this chat between my daughter and my wife. It started with my daughter asking whether my wife had stopped going to the gym. My wife replied that she was finishing the gym at office during lunch time, so it wasn’t visible to the kid anymore. This is how the conversation continued: Kid : “Really? You go to the gym during lunch time? How long is your lunch break?” Wife : “An hour and a half.” Kid : “Wow! You’re so lucky. We

Santosh Desai cited an instance of a recent victim of social media, an award winning Indian chef in Dubai. Angry with the portrayal of Hindus as terrorists in an American serial, he let fly about Islam. There was a reaction to that, and at the end of it all, he’d lost his restaurant. Desai focuses the rest of the blog on why people land on these situations via social media, even though we’ve heard of others who paid a heavy price: “There is something about social media that encourages this kind of gratuitous sharing… In real life, we are aware of the fact that our actions and words have real world consequences. We are careful about expressing opinions, and are mindful of how others might react. This is why we back-bite (and not front-nibble) and why gossip is whispered, not shouted or broadcast. But on social media, we lose this self-imposed restraint, because of an illusion of detached distance.” With social media, on the one hand: “The opinions we hold about the world a

When doctors prescribe medicines for pretty much every ailment, some people protest. Is it really necessary? Don’t the medicines have side-effects? Are the doctors getting a kickback for prescribing certain medicines? How will the immune system ever develop? Won’t germs become more resistant if we over-use such medicines? On the other hand, doctors who recommend that the patient let the illness run its course are taking a chance. Will the patient just go to another doc who’ll prescribe medication? Will such a patient give a bad rating (online or verbally) about the doc to the clinic/ hospital/ friends? I realized how complicated this whole topic can be as I read Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s Antifragile . Taleb mentioned that centuries back, a doctor, Ignaz Semmelweis, noticed that more women seemed to die giving birth in hospitals than giving birth on the street. His findings were dismissed, partly because the news didn’t suit the medical community; but also because he had no the

A couple of years back, I put a torch behind my daughter’s hand, turned it on, and voila! Her hand appeared red in color. I told her it was because blood is red in color. Because that’s what I’d been told as a kid. But that’s not the reason at all, as I learnt later. The correct reason is: “Only one color of light passes completely through your hand- and that's why it looks red. All of the other colors are completely absorbed, either by the skin, bones, muscles, blood or other cells in your body. Most of the red light passes right through all of these cells…” But wait, things are even more interesting: “Most of the red light passes right through all of these cells except your blood cells- but not even all of your blood cells. Red light passes through the blood in your arteries, but is absorbed by the blood in your veins. That's why your veins appear black.” (The difference between arteries and veins is the amount of oxygen in them, which affects how much of the