Hate it, but Ape it
Santosh Desai cited
an instance of a recent victim of social media, an award winning Indian chef in
Dubai. Angry with the portrayal of Hindus as terrorists in an American serial,
he let fly about Islam. There was a reaction to that, and at the end of it all,
he’d lost his restaurant.
Desai focuses the
rest of the blog on why people land on these situations via social media, even
though we’ve heard of others who paid a heavy price:
“There is something about social media that
encourages this kind of gratuitous sharing… In real life, we are aware of the
fact that our actions and words have real world consequences. We are careful
about expressing opinions, and are mindful of how others might react. This is
why we back-bite (and not front-nibble) and why gossip is whispered, not
shouted or broadcast. But on social media, we lose this self-imposed restraint,
because of an illusion of detached distance.”
With social media,
on the one hand:
“The opinions we hold about the world are
becoming an increasingly central part of our self-identity. We feel the need to
express a view on virtually every major event in the world and hold strong
views on things political and otherwise.”
Every action then
has an opposite (if not equal) reaction, via the same social media:
“Every strong opinion is likely to find
support as well as attract venomous anger.”
This side of
social media may well be one of the reasons why the “regular” media tries to
stay away and is contemptuous of it. Also, because the age of the average
person on regular media is, well, old. But that’s probably starting to change, laments
ex-New York Times editor, Jill
Abramson:
“From four years of teaching at Harvard, so
many of my students are interested in journalism, but they mostly want to write
first-person, highly personal narratives about themselves. That may
reflect their age. But I think there’s too much of that in journalism.
It’s not about us. It’s about the world, and covering the world.”
If you see how the
English news channels sound in India today, they sound exactly like Abramson’s
Harvard students. Except, they like to talk down to everyone as if their view
is some objective, universal truth. While regular media may not want to be on
social media (entirely), they sure behave the same way a lot of the time.
Comments
Post a Comment