Caligula, Historians and Truth


When I got this Hourly History e-book on two Roman emperors, Marcus Aurelius and Caligula, I expected the part on the former to be interesting. Boy, was I wrong.

Caligula was the third Roman emperor. In the first 6 months, here’s what he did:
“Caligula restored voting rights, distributed bread and gifts, and hosted games and theatricals for the people’s entertainment…. (He) built two aquaducts… He restored vassal kings to their thrones… He annulled unpopular taxes and gave magistrates the right to make decisions without consulting him.”
In short, “Caligula was the very image of a good and benevolent ruler”.

Then in 37 A.D., he fell very ill, including a swelling of the brain and/or epilepsy. When he finally emerged, he was a “very changed man”. He was convinced he had been poisoned, and ordered his co-regent to be murdered without trial. He began to have incestuous relationships with two of his sisters. He declared himself to be not just the “Greatest and Best Caesar”, but a god.

He depleted the coffers with extravagant spending. He started imposing levies on pretty much anything and everything. He came up with increasingly “crueler and more creative humiliations” for the Senators. When meat became scarce during gladiatorial games, he had criminals thrown to the animals, no matter how minor their offense. He was particularly cruel towards Senators. Death and execution was soon commonplace and the reasons became more and more whimsical.

No wonder then that he was the target of multiple conspiracies and assassination attempts. This made him more and more paranoid. Rightly or wrongly, he used them as excuses to purge out many Senators. By now, he had destroyed more than half of the 600 Senators, one way or the other. Eventually:
“He planned to dissolve the Senate and declare himself king in the autocratic style of the east.”
This was too much for the Senate. And they had Caligula assassinated. Surprisingly:
“The people of Rome, who had not suffered as much as the nobles under Caligula’s rule and still supported him… demanded the death of the conspirators.”

Story over? Not quite. The book then questions if historians were being honest about Caligula! Or was all this “a smear campaign that has lasted for centuries”? Did Caligula despise the Senators because they just flattered him to suit their needs? Did he believe he was being lied to all the time? He had experienced the “scheming and back-stabbing of the aristocracy” first-hand before he became emperor: it had resulted in the deaths of his parents and brothers. They had tried to use him as a pawn against the then emperor as well.

As an emperor, he sought exorbitant amounts to “bleed the noble houses dry, to force them to ruin themselves in pursuit of favour he was disinclined to ever give”. Was there a method behind every “mad act”?

But if all this is true, why did historians write the way they did? Was it because “a writer in Rome needed to stay on the good side of the Senate”? Did they have to play ball to a Senate which “wanted to present an image of serenity and wisdom”? Was it “politically expedient” to brand the emperor who truly exercised imperial power as being insane?

All of which is why the book ends with some eternal truths:
“Most writers have a bias in their work… Bias can lead to fabrication and the death of truth… In highly politicized and fractious times, ignorance of bias can be deadly. Beliefs in falsehoods can easily turn into unjustified actions, which can in turn lead to devastating repercussions."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more