Praying for Filter Failure!

A couple of years back, I wrote about the complaint of people drowning in the endless stream of information that is available online. Clay Shirky’s response (“It’s not information overload. It’s filter failure.”) from 2008 made perfect sense to me.

Recently, I stumbled upon Nick Carr’s argument that Shirky only got it backwards. The reason many feel swamped is, as per Carr?
“It’s not information overload. It’s filter success.”
The exact opposite of what Shirky said! And it sounds completely wrong. And so Carr elaborates.

Carr points out there are 2 types of information overload:
1)      Situational overload (“You need a particular piece of information…and that piece of information is buried in a bunch of other pieces of information.”)
2)     Ambient overload (“We’re surrounded by so much information that is of immediate interest to us that we feel overwhelmed by the neverending pressure of trying to keep up with it all.”)
Google solved the situational overload problem. It’s the ambient overload that most people complain about:
“We keep clicking links, keep hitting the refresh key, keep opening new tabs, keep checking email in-boxes and RSS feeds and Facebook notifications, keep scanning Amazon and Netflix recommendations – and yet the pile of interesting information never shrinks.”

Or as Carr summarizes the difference:
“The cause of situational overload is too much noise. The cause of ambient overload is too much signal.”
And he points out:
“As today’s filters improve, they expand the information we feel compelled to take notice of. Yes, they winnow out the uninteresting stuff (imperfectly), but they deliver a vastly greater supply of interesting stuff. And precisely because the information is of interest to us, we feel pressure to attend to it. As a result, our sense of overload increases.”

So what’s the solution? Carr says, half tongue-in-cheek:
“If you really want a respite from information overload, pray for filter failure.”

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarDecember 2, 2016 at 11:06 AM

    Some say, "The movement from jumble to meaning can be summarized thus: Data to information to knowledge to, finally, wisdom seems the direction".

    Ultimately, we have already made the digital systems handle data and information. Knowledge is a queasy thing and people are trying raise computers to arrive at this in a much better way than what we have today. In my opinion, wisdom will forever elude the machines.

    I may be wrong of course. From the science of biology point of view, after all, all organisms are machines and no matter how egocentrically we imagine our glory, human beings are only biological machines. And if we, the biological machines, can have wisdom, why not some other man-made machine?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more