Why, Why, Why

Kids have this habit of asking “Why?” about everything. Like all parents, I’ve experienced different emotions when that happens:
-         It’s flattering because you know the answer;
-         Enjoying the experience of phrasing the explanation in a way that the kid gets it;
-         It sets off a hope that you’ve done your bit to encourage the kid to stay curious and seek (and hopefully understand) explanations;
-         It shames me that I don’t know something so basic;
-         And of course, at times it can be highly irritating.
One time, my 5 year old daughter asked me yet another Why question and I replied, “It’s too complicated to explain to you”. Upon which, she said, “But you’ve simplified other things in the past; so why can’t you to do it for this too?” I was both flattered and ashamed.

In this terrific video, Richard Feynman points out some key points about answering the Why questions:
“When you explain a why, you have to be in some framework that you allow something to be true. Otherwise, you’re perpetually asking why.”
Citing an example, he says:
“For example, if you go, “Why did she slip on the ice?” Well, ice is slippery. Everybody knows that, no problem. But you ask why is ice slippery?... And then you’re involved with something, because there aren’t many things as slippery as ice. It’s not very hard to get greasy stuff, but that’s sort of wet and slimy. But a solid that’s so slippery?”

In the same video, Feynman also brings out the inherent dangers of using analogies when trying to explain things. The first risk is obvious: there will always be some differences between the actual thing and the analogy you use, which if not identified, can lead to a wrong understanding. The second risk is, well, let Feynman explain it himself:
“For example, if we said the magnets attract like rubber bands, I would be cheating you. Because they’re not connected by rubber bands. I’d soon be in trouble. And secondly, if you were curious enough, you’d ask me why rubber bands tend to pull back together again, and I would end up explaining that in terms of electrical forces, which are the very things that I’m trying to use the rubber bands to explain. So I have cheated very badly, you see.”
All of which is why Feynman tells the interviewer:
“I really can’t do a good job, any job, of explaining magnetic force in terms of something else you’re more familiar with, because I don’t understand it in terms of anything else that you’re more familiar with.”

So there, kiddo, that’s why I can’t explain certain things using analogies: because there are no analogies that work. Thank you, Feynman!

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarDecember 12, 2016 at 6:18 PM

    Good. From the child "why" you covered something adults just evade to themselves.

    Now, as usual, i take off to my favorite domain - Spirituality. The nature the Supreme Divine is not only not amenable to any comparison but even transdends any conceptualizarion. In that sense it is nothing like magnetism or for that matter any cocept of science. Yet it cannot be ignored too - it is more assertive than anything; it is True Eistence on which all fleeting existences of the universe "float' precariously! It forever pushes us to Itself, believe it or not. :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more