Livewired Brain #6: Future of Technology?
Based on this series of blogs on the livewired brain, which was based on David Eagleman’s Livewired, you’d be wondering whether/when our technologies would become that way. Would they become capable of changing themselves based on their “experience” of the world?
Actually, our
software algorithms have already become like the brain, at least the ones we
call Machine Learning. Voice recognition (Alexa), facial recognition (how your
phone unlocks itself), and anything that feels like AI falls in that bucket.
But the hardware doesn’t change itself. Human engineers and designers still have
to make deliberate changes to the hardware.
Let’s say we do
get to a point where even the hardware can re-do itself. Sure, it’d be great in
many ways, for obvious reasons. Then again:
“Note
that a future of self-configuring devices will change what it means to fix
them.”
Huh? Eagleman
points out that we already face that today! While “construction workers or car
mechanics are rarely surprised” (a broken down part has predictable
consequences… and solutions), neurologists struggle to deal with patients with
the same problem, since each of whom responds differently to the same
treatment. Which is why Eagleman writes:
“Construction
workers and car mechanics in the distant future will have to be more like
neurologists, feeling around for general principles rather than expecting to
fish out a specific wire or bolt.”
Actually, I am not
sure about that. We’ve already run into problems with our Machine Learning
algorithms that we have no idea how to fix. Because we (including its creators)
have no idea of how it works in the first place! Sure, now and then, we are able to identify
the cause of the failure (like why Amazon’s CV vetting algorithm shortlisted
far, far more men than women: because hey, historical data suggested men were
better at most jobs), but most of the time, we don’t have the first clue, no
“general principles” on how the algorithm works.
So perhaps we should be careful about wishing that our technologies would become more “livewired”, more brain-like in their ability to change both hardware and software. Instead, maybe we should remind ourselves of that ancient saying, “Be careful what you wish for, it might come true”…
Comments
Post a Comment