MU-8: Can We Program a Universe?

See the explanation of brains in vats here…

The last blog in the series talked about the brains in vats thought experiment. Now let’s flip that scenario: can we humans create a simulated universe?

The easiest way to attempt such a thing is via software programs. Bozhidar Bozhanov writes about just such a programming competition where the aim is to come up with the rules for a universe that finally resulted in this:
“One’s universe had to give birth to conscious beings that manage to uncover all the laws of their universe and also figure out they are being imagined.”
This isn’t as easy as it sounds: forget a universe that produces life forms; even coming up with rules that don’t cause a universe to collapse are hard! In fact the competition’s so hard that the contestants are given three chances to step in and interfere with their simulations (though there are some constraints on what kinds of changes they are allowed to do) during the course of the game.

The universe of one of the participants in the game produced conscious life forms who then did very interesting things:
“The beings started discovering his imagined laws one by one, figuring out the world around them. Some even assumed that they are being imaginary, although they couldn’t prove that. Some deified the “imaginer”. Some thought they are not just matter, which was technically correct, as they were imagined.”

If you didn’t notice it already, let me state the similarities between us and such simulated life forms:
-         The life forms are able to figure out many rules of their universe.
-         The rules of the universe are mathematical to both: after all, software is just a branch of maths called boolean algebra.
-         Some life forms deify the creator/imaginer/programmer.
-         A computer has limitations on accuracy (number of places after the decimal that it can store/process). Or to put it differently, everything is discrete and not continuous. In other words, quantized. Does that sound like quantum theory or what?

So what are we then? Brains in vats? Or creators of brains in vats? Or one in a recursive chain of brains in vats?

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarMarch 20, 2017 at 11:20 AM

    Ah, this is good. We are discussing philosophy, not really science. That is entertaining because science is no longer a domain for the common man; the specialists rule and they speak a language that only they understand (hopefully).

    As the contents, I don't know what to say; so I won't comment. I suppose your blog too concludes in that vein only.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more