MU-7: Brains in Vats

(This blog will not appear to have any connection to maths and make you wonder about the title. So let me clarify at the start: it’s meant as a build-up to the next blog that will make the connection clear).

Have you heard of the “brain in a vat” thought experiment? Here’s how it goes: imagine that you are not who/what you think you are; instead you are just a brain hooked up into electrodes that can perfectly simulate the experiences of what you think is the outside world.

The kicker with this thought experiment? You can neither prove nor disprove that it is true! And since you can’t disprove it, it follows that it is entirely possible that nothing about your perception of “reality” is true either! I don’t know if this is in any way similar to the Hindu concept of maya…but it does sound similar to some extent.

I am in that camp which feels that just because something cannot be disproven doesn’t make it true. Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t. And practically speaking, I wonder, does it even matter whether we are brains in vats or the “real” thing? Either way, wouldn’t our perception of the world be the same (we would observe cause and effect, experience pleasure and pain, happiness and sadness in both cases)? So why spend time on such an unanswerable question that in any case doesn’t make any difference to anything?

And then I read John Barrow’s book, The Infinite Book, and realized that it may matter after all. He points out that David Hume analyzed the impact of us living in a simulation on the idea of God:
“Many worlds (simulations) might have been botched and bungled, throughout an eternity, when this system was struck out…This world, for aught he knows, is faulty and imperfect, compared to a superior standard, and was only the first rude essay of some infant deity who afterwards abandoned it, ashamed of his lame performance; it is the work of some dependent, inferior deity; and is the object of derision to his superiors…”
Then there’s the impact on how we should live if we know we are in a simulation. Barrow describes Robert Hanson’s point very humorously:
“After all, Hanson suggests, if you are part of somebody’s simulation, be entertaining! Be famous! Be a pivotal person! This will increase the chances of your simulated experience continuing, and others will want to resimulate you in the future. Fail to have these characteristics and you could become like the soap-opera character who quickly gets written out of the show, taking a long holiday in Vladivostok, never to return.”

I guess philosophies can lead to any conclusions you would like them to “prove”.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more