Continual Improvement
In the West, we
see periodic clamouring that Google or Facebook or Amazon has too much data,
and that they be split up e.g. Google into search, YouTube, Gmail and Android
each as a separate company. Or Facebook into, er, Facebook, Instagram and
WhatsApp as separate companies.
While India sees
the problem, the DEPA framework acknowledges some of the benefits of one
company having a lot of data. A massive Amazon or Flipkart that delivers all
over the country can bring down costs for consumers, something not possible if
every company in that sector was small.
What then would be
a good balance? Rahul Matthan asks us to consider a bank in in The Third Way. As the entity with all the personal
financial data, it has an outsized advantage. No new entity with a new idea in
the lending space can ever hope to compete against a bank with so much
information. DEPA’s architecture has a way, at least in theory. The data the
banks holds is actually the account owner’s data. Therefore, the system (and
laws) can insist that the bank make available the account owner’s data to
anyone in a standardized format if authorized/requested by the individual.
This would make new players get access to data too (if authorized).
This Indian
approach doesn’t need companies broken up. Large companies do create certain
benefits for society (like the lower prices of Flipkart and Amazon); it is the
data monopoly aspect that needs to be shaken up.
Many EU countries are thinking on similar lines as India. The problem though is they don’t have an Aadhar equivalent digital ID nor do they have a tech infrastructure base like India Stack to operationalize these ideas. Whereas India does, and it is not sitting back on its laurels. It is continuously evolving and improving the India Stack via both new ideas, new needs and the DEPA framework.
Comments
Post a Comment