Exception to the Rule Needed
There’s a disorder
called hemochromatosis in which extra iron builds up
in the body. One treatment is for such people to donate their blood regularly.
The good thing? The extra iron doesn’t come into their blood, so their blood
can be infused into recipients without any risk. Nor is there any risk of
transfer of genetic diseases.
Sounds perfect,
right? Except the American Red Cross has a policy that:
“Potential
donors are not allowed to receive direct compensation for their donation
(beyond the usual orange juice and cookie).”
See how this
becomes a problem?
“Because
people with hemochromatosis would otherwise have to pay for their therapeutic
phlebotomies (removing blood from them), they would in effect be getting
something of value for being able to donate for free. Thus the Red Cross has
ruled that such donations violate their policy.”
It gets even more
weird. When a hemochromatosis patient pays to have his blood removed, most
American agencies will throw it away. Instead of infusing it into someone.
While one can see the reason behind the rule (it’s to prevent coercive blood donation), surely by now, they could have added an exception to the rule…
Comments
Post a Comment