British India: Famines
I remember our
history books mentioning many famines in India. I always assumed it was tragic
but unavoidable for that era. Which is why I was taken aback when I read Shashi
Tharoor’s An Era of Darkness.
Here is a
startling contrast. During British rule, between 30 to 35 million Indians died
due to famines. Post independence, no famines have taken place. Even though our
own governments were inefficient, corrupt and not exactly quick to respond. How
come? Because in democracies with a free press, governments are held more
accountable, which then triggers effective response.
“Lack
of (true) democracy and public accountability, however, is what was
characterized British rule in India.”
Lack of
accountability aside, the British had 3 considerations that drove them to
intervene as minimally as possible to famine. (1) They believed
in letting the market forces decide (demand and supply), (2) the
Malthusian doctrine (overpopulation was the cause and the famine was nature’s
correction) and (3) why spend money on a country which they
intended to loot. (For what it is worth, on this matter, the British were not
racist. They followed the same policies during Irish famines as well).
One might think
that famines back then were not handled well by any ruler, and ask if the
British were worse by the standards of that era. They were much worse. During
the 1866 Orrisa Famine, the British happily exported 200 million pounds of rice
to Britain. Will Durant wrote of the “brutal collection of high taxes in the
very midst of famine”. Local rulers all did the opposite during famines
– they reduced taxes, banned export of food, and transferred food to the
impacted areas. This is why famines before the British were never as bad in
their impact.
Even after the
railway lines had been laid, and the speed at which food could have been
transported in times of famines could have been faster, the data shows no such
improvement in the handling of famines. The railways, as I wrote in an earlier
blog, were never created to do good for Indians...
Even in the middle
of the 1943 Bengal famine, Churchill’s priority was to send food from India to
British troops across Europe. They breed like rabbits, was Churchill’s comment.
British ships laden with wheat coming from Australia went to Britain’s war effort
in Europe, even though famine hit India lay on the way. Being a far more recent
event, the callousness, the racism and the self-centeredness of Britain is far
better documented than earlier famines.
Those words perfectly summarize British rule of India – racist and self-centered.
Comments
Post a Comment