Endless Contradictions

Even when the contradictions and problems with the different-laws-for-different-religions slam into other values that liberals hold dear, they just look the other way, write Harsh Madhusudan and Rajeev Mantri in A New Idea of India.

 

Take gender equality, for example. Liberals do believe in it. And obviously, triple talaq clashes with that value. And yet, when triple talaq was made illegal:

“A significant number of ‘secular’ politicians and intellectuals argue that women-friendly reform should come from within the community.”

But the same folks have no problem when groups want to enact laws against over-the-top superstition (in Hinduism, of course), what they call “blind faith”:

“This is a strange distinction, for faith, by definition, is blind.”

And who decides what is blind faith v/s good old faith anyway? (The point here isn’t whether such efforts are good; the point is about the inconsistency).

 

Having differentiated Indians based on religion, assigning different laws to each group, the contradiction becomes evident at the time of doling out benefits like gas subsidies, and almost every other subsidy:

“When it comes to economic redistribution, and the welfare state, the ghettos disappear for the Nehruvian worldview, and we all become Indians once again.”

Such a setup, where the government can arbitrarily decide when we are one people and when we are different people is guaranteed to produce one outcome - bias, both deliberate and accidental.

 

Why are educational institutes allowed to follow different rules if they are minority institutions? Maybe there are valid reasons, but the contradiction rears its head here too:

“Top ranked institutions like St. Stephen’s College in Delhi, Christian Medical College in Vellore, St. Xavier’s College in Kolkata and countless missionary schools across India clearly declare themselves to be minority institutions and admit Christian students through explicit quotas; all of this is done at a subsidy, implicit and explicit, from Indian taxpayers, who are largely Hindus.”

In a secular country, why should any institution that associates itself with religion in any way, be funded by the state? Orwellian secularism again.

 

As if all this isn’t bad enough, we have ridiculous rules that are asymmetric between Hindus and other minorities. Who is being discriminated here?

“By law, a Hindu cannot be a member of the NCMEI (National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions)… Non-Hindu Supreme Court judges or a local district collector can be trusted to judge knotty theological issues pertaining to Hinduism… Even though a Christian or a Parsi can define policy and adjudicate issues concerning Muslims and vice-versa, somehow a Hindu can be disqualified from doing the same.”

 

In the 2014 elections, each side raised a massacre: Godhra, and 1984. You can call that politics as usual, but even people like Amartya Sen claimed they differed:

“There is no philosophy of killing Sikhs in the Congress.”

Really, that’s a difference? So Nazism is only bad because their philosophy called to eliminate the Jews, not because of their actions? Whereas Mao’s Great Leap forward which resulted in the deaths of millions is OK because, hey, communist philosophy never called to kill them? This is such a ridiculous argument that it deserves the contemptuous response in the book:

“(Since the Congress) can actually kill in practice, there is no need to kill in theory.”

 

It’s one thing for politicians to not budge, to stay hypocritical. But it doesn’t end there, does it? The acknowledged intellectuals, most of whom are not politicians, subscribe to these views too.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more