Rewriting History, not Always a Bad Thing

When anyone comes up with a new narrative of historical events or paints a new picture of an important character, some look at it as a genuine attempt at revisiting the facts. Others wonder if it is just another attempt to rewrite history to suit an agenda. With events that are very old, one can never be sure what really happened. Even with more recent, better documented events, one never knows the motives behind actions: Malice? Incompetence? Greed? Ambition? Miscalculation? Or something else?

Three recent incidents got me thinking about all this. The first was this Shekhar Gupta talk on some of the long-reaching and/or courageous decisions made by India’s short-term PM’s like VP Singh, Chandra Shekhar, IK Gujral and Deve Gowda. That was an eye-opener for me, because (a) I had dismissed them as inconsequential due to their short tenures, plus they felt opportunistic PM’s, and (b) “official” history only talks of the Nehru-Gandhi scions (Even PV Narasimha Rao who wasn’t “short-term”, is ignored altogether, but more on him in a bit). This talk, by the way, is the only one on my list which is overwhelmingly factual.

The second piece was the opposite: entirely agenda-driven. It was Manmohan Singh blaming the then Home Minister, PV Narasimha Rao, for the 1984 riots that killed 3,000 Sikhs. How? Because he didn’t call in the Army. Yeah, right. Like the Army can be called in without the Cabinet agreeing, and guess who presided over the Cabinet? Good old Rajiv, he of the “when a big tree falls (aka mama Indira), the ground will shake” infamy. The Congress and Sonia’s lap dog, Manmohan, apparently still believe they can absolve Rajiv Gandhi of 1984. As the BJP wondered, if Manmohan held Rao responsible for the massacre, why did he agree to serve as Finance Minister under Rao?

The last piece was on Gandhi’s assassin, Nathuram Godse. No, this wasn’t nonsense of the Godse-was-innocent variety. Rather, it went into the self-proclaimed motives behind the act. First, this wasn’t murder; it was an assassination. The difference? An assassination, at least in this case, is because of  total disagreement with the policies of the person in power. Of course, that doesn’t make it right, but it makes you think:
1)      After all, Gandhi didn’t hold any official post in government: Yes, but he wielded an inordinate amount of power and influence. Can one really say this was different than Bal Thackeray and Sonia decades later?
2)     What were the policies that Godse opposed enough to kill over? Godse considered Gandhi a mass-murderer. What?! He felt Gandhi’s blackmail-by-fasting forced the government to obey him, some of which contributed to the horrors of Partition.
3)   Saint or politician? Both of the above lead to the question: was Gandhi the anti-Spiderman? As in, power without responsibility?
Don’t get me wrong: Gandhi was not the Bad Guy. But shouldn’t history be about acknowledging the black and the grey aspects of the man as well? After all, isn’t history about real people, most of whom are neither pure evil nor pure good?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more