North East - Assam/Bodo
Given
the pin drop silence in international response to the abrogation of Article 370
and the status of J&K within India, I’d wondered if Modi was copying the
Chinese playbook: if you criticize us, we’ll (temporarily) prevent companies
from your country from doing business in our country. An NBA manager tweeted in
support of Hong Kong, and China took all NBA matches off the air. An EPL
footballer criticized the treatment of Uighur Muslims, and China prevented the
broadcast of the match of his club, Arsenal, in China. You get the drift…
“Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India is
an avowed student of the Chinese experiment. Is it so far-fetched to imagine
that he would help to create comparable pressures on speech for institutions
doing business with India?”
But it
seems like there’s one area where Modi does not seem to follow the
Chinese playbook: how to deal with areas that want to secede. The Chinese way
has been to send the Han majority to those areas (Tibet, Uighur etc), and over
time, change the demographics enough that there’d be no demand for seceding.
On that
front, Modi seems to be deal with the North East differently. In his last term,
a lot of folks from the North East used to say that development projects were
getting sanctioned and executed faster than ever before. I’ve never been there,
but it would certainly explain why the BJP started winning state elections and
Lok Sabha seats (in 2019) in the North East. Of course, the Chinese threat may
also have played a role in Modi’s choices: if those regions remained backward,
they’d be more susceptible to Chinese overtures.
In
Assam, insurgent morale was low: the will of the Center to hold on showed no
signs of waning, development projects (as explained above) were reducing
grudges, and Bangladesh was no longer a safe haven for them anymore. The top
Bodo leader, Ranjan Diamary, was in fact extradited to India some time back
from Bangladesh.
At such
a time, from a position of strength, the Indian government offered to negotiate
and gave several concessions, says Shekhar Gupta. The Bodo issue was always
greater autonomy, not secession. During the negotiations, the Center even
released Ranjan Diamary on bail. Greater autonomy was granted to some of the
districts, including the Bomdila region which China had tried to annex in
1962.
Will
the deal work? Only time will tell. But it shows that the Modi government is
willing to rule with an iron fist (think J&K), but is also willing to
switch to the velvet glove approach as in the Assam/Bodo case.
Comments
Post a Comment