Inflection Point


In this interesting podcast, Alex Tabarrok repeatedly points out there is no one answer on what works, and there’s no certainty on what comes next. Nah, he wasn’t talking of life in general; he was making those comments on the topic of what it takes to sustain economic growth:
  1.  Traditional wisdom says the must-have’s for economic growth include strong institutions, rule of law, free markets and democracy. But then, he says, there’s the elephant in the room: China.
  2. It used to be fashionable to point at India and China’s populations as problems not just for those countries, but increasingly for the world as they get richer, and consume and pollute more. Then again, both countries will invest more in R&D as they get richer, and having more people would increase the odds of new ideas and solutions to today’s problems. “People as stomachs” or “People as brains”, he calls the two views. Which is right?
  3. Today, China’s growth looks unstoppable. But he points out, a couple of decades back, Japan looked like the economic superpower that might surpass the US. And Japan just stagnated since then.

No clear answers. No sure outcomes. It’s not a good feeling, and yet there it is.

Add to all of that a narrative that has stopped working. This is the state of the world today, writes Yuval Noah Harari in 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. In the last century, we had 3 stories vying for supremacy, he says: the fascist story, the communist story, and the liberal story. By the end of the century, the liberal story had won. So today in 2019, why does the liberal story lie in tatters?

Harari believes the liberal political system was a child of its times:
“(It was) shaped during the industrial era to manage a world of steam engines, oil refineries, and television sets.”
It also responded to, and learnt from, the competing stories:
“The liberal story learned from communism to expand the circle of empathy and to value equality along with liberty… (so it included) working-class people, women, minorities and non-Westerners.”
Given its success, the liberal narrative soon assumed it was a “set-menu approach” - To be successful and rich, a society needed all the prescribed courses: free markets, privatization, free trade, global integration, democracy, rule of law, minority rights, multilateral cooperation, individualism, and ease of immigration.

But increasingly, with the rise of artificial intelligence, Big Data, algorithms that run the world, and biotech, it is clear that the liberal system doesn’t fit anymore nor is it able to adapt fast enough. The societal changes are radical:
“Very soon somebody will have to decide how to use this power… Philosophers are very patient people, but engineers are far less patient, and investors are the least patient of all. If you don’t know what to do with the power, market forces will not wait a thousand years for you to come with an answer.”

And so, as the liberal system fails to stay relevant with AI and biotech, there is a vacuum. And who’s to even say that there is one narrative for all of mankind?
“Maybe each country should adopt a different idiosyncratic path, defined by its own ancient traditions?”

Countries have shifted to a “buffet mentality”, picking only those courses from the liberal narrative that they like and ignoring the rest. No, not just China, but even the US with its isolationist trend, Britain with Brexit, an oligarchic Russia under Putin, and “strongmen” in India and Turkey. Since all permutations are on the table, we hear terms like “illiberal democracy”.

So yes, tough times ahead:
“We are still in the nihilistic moment of disillusionment and anger, after people have lost faith in the old stories but before they have embraced a new one.”
So how do we move forward?
“The first step is to tone down the prophecies of doom, and switch from panic mode to bewilderment. Panic is a form of hubris. It comes from the smug feeling that I know exactly where the world is heading – down. Bewilderment is more humble, and therefore more clear-sighted.”
Eventually, we will come up with a new/adjusted narrative, one that includes “artificial intelligence, Big Data algorithms and bioengineering”. After all, as Harari says:
“Humans think in stories rather than in facts, numbers or equations, and the simpler the story, the better.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more