Information Theory - Part 3: Life


What other topics does information theory answer, Charles Seife asks and answers in Decoding the Universe. How about that question from philosophy: what is the purpose of life?

And the answer increasingly seems to be:
“Duplicate your (genetic) information. Sure, the programs go about the task in different ways, but the goal is always the same. Reproduction. All else is decoration – decoration that helps the program to achieve its ultimate goal.”
Wonder if that’s true? Isn’t the individual trying to reproduce the entire organism? How can one say that information within is trying to reproduce (only) itself?

Are we stuck with a chicken and egg question here, each left to his own preference with no way to prove/know?

Aha, but organisms in nature increasingly align with one view:
“That the organism reproduces is just a by-product of the information duplicating itself… sometimes.”
This view explains why an ant colony has only fertile organism – the queen. By the copy-the-organism view, it makes no sense why the other sterile ants do all the work! But by the copy-the-information view, you realize that because the queen is their mother, so all her children share half their DNA with every ant in the colony. In which case, the sterile ants are ensuring (half) their instructions (DNA) are getting duplicated.

This view also explains the t gene in mice. If there’s just one copy of it in an organism, nothing good or bad happens. Normally a gene has 50% chances of getting passed on during reproduction. Not so the t gene. It has a 95% chance of being passed on. Do the maths and you realize that a mice population should soon get overrun with copies of the t gene. And so it does. But now more and more individuals end up with 2 copies of the t gene (one from each parent). Where one copy was harmless, two are lethal. And with more individuals having 2 copies, they start dropping like flies. Such a gene doesn’t fit the copy-the-organism worldview, but it certainly fits the each-piece-of-information-only-cares-to-make-copies-of-itself.

Still not convinced? Take the bacterium-like creature responsible for our mitochondrial DNA. That creature is long extinct. And yet, the information that was in that creature now resides in us, in the mitochondria of each of our cells:
“The information has jumped vehicles, and when the original organism died out, the information survived.”
Information can survive the extinction of the species: Try beating that!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more